(ProQuest: ... denotes non-US-ASCII text omitted.)
Alexey Chopovsky 1, 2 and Maxim Eingorn 3 and Alexander Zhuk 2
Academic Editor:Douglas Singleton
1, Department of Theoretical Physics, Odessa National University, Dvoryanskaya Street 2, Odessa 65082, Ukraine
2, Astronomical Observatory, Odessa National University, Dvoryanskaya Street 2, Odessa 65082, Ukraine
3, North Carolina Central University, CREST and NASA Research Centers, Fayetteville Street 1801, Durham, NC 27707, USA
Received 31 October 2013; Accepted 10 December 2013
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
It may turn out that our Universe is multidimensional and has more than three spatial dimensions. This fantastic idea was first proposed in the twenties of the last century in the papers by Kaluza and Klein [1, 2], and since then it has consistently attracted attention of researchers. Obviously, to be compatible with our observable four-dimensional spacetime, the extra dimensions should be compact and sufficiently small. According to the recent accelerator experiments, their size should be of the order or less than the Fermi length 10-17 cm. (In the brane-world models, the extra dimensions can be significantly larger [3, 4]. We do not consider such models in our paper.) If the internal space is very small, the hope to detect them is connected with Kaluza-Klein (KK) particles which correspond to appropriate eigenfunctions of the internal manifold, that is, excitations of fields in the given internal space. Such excitations were investigated in many articles (see, e.g., the classical papers [5-7]). Quite recently, KK particles were considered, for example, in the papers [8, 9].
The internal compact space can have different topology. The Ricci-flat space is of special interest because Calabi-Yau manifolds, which are widely used in the superstring theory [10], belong to this class. A particular case of toroidal compactification was considered in our previous paper [11]. We demonstrate in this paper that metric perturbations depend only on coordinates of the external spacetime; that is, the corresponding KK particles are absent. In our approach, the metric perturbations are caused by a system of gravitating masses, for example, by astrophysical objects. This is the main difference between our investigation and studies in [8, 9] where the metric and form-field perturbations are considered without taking into account the reason of such fluctuations. Our analysis in [11] clearly shows that the inclusion of the matter sources, being responsible for the perturbations, imposes strong restrictions on the model. In the present paper, we investigate this important phenomenon in the case of Ricci-flat internal spaces and arrive again at the same conclusions. That is, KK modes corresponding to the metric fluctuations are absent. We also show that gravitating masses should be uniformly smeared over the internal space. From the point of quantum mechanics, this means that particles must be only in the ground state with respect to the internal space. Of course, it looks very unnatural. According to statistical physics, any nonzero temperature should result in fluctuations, that is, in KK states.
The paper is structured as follows. In Section 2, we consider the multidimensional model with the Ricci-flat internal space. This background spacetime is perturbed by the system of gravitating masses. We demonstrate that the metric perturbations do not depend on the coordinates of the internal space and gravitating masses are uniformly smeared over the internal space. That is, KK modes are absent. In Section 3, we provide the exact expressions for the metric correction terms. The main results are briefly summarized in concluding Section 4.
2. Smeared Extra Dimensions
We consider a block-diagonal background metrics, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] which is determined on ( ...9F; = 1 + D = 4 + d ) -dimensional product manifold ... ...9F; = ... 4 × ... d . Here, η μ ν ( 4 ) ( μ , ν = 0,1 , 2,3 ) is the metrics of the four-dimensional Minkowski spacetime and g ^ m n ( d ) ( y ) ( m , n = 4 , ... , D ) is the metrics of some d -dimensional internal (usually compact) Ricci-flat space with coordinates y ...1; y m : [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
In what follows, X M ( M = 0,1 , 2 , ... , D ) are coordinates on ... ...9F; , x μ = X μ ( μ = 0,1 , 2,3 ) are coordinates on ... 4 , and y m = X m ( m = 4,5 , ... , 3 + d ) are coordinates on ... d . We will also use the definitions for the spatial coordinates X ~ : X M ~ ( M ~ = 1,2 , ... , D ) and x ~ : x μ ~ = X μ ~ ( μ ~ = 1,2 , 3 ) .
Now, we perturb the metrics (1) by a system of N discrete massive (with rest masses m p , p = 1 , ... , N ) bodies. We suppose that the pressure of these bodies in the external three-dimensional space is much less than their energy density. This is a natural approximation for ordinary astrophysical objects such as our Sun. For example, in general relativity, this approach works well for calculating the gravitational experiments in the solar system [12]. In other words, the gravitating bodies are pressureless in the external/our space. On the other hand, we suppose that they may have pressure in the extra dimensions. Therefore, nonzero components of the energy-momentum tensor of the system can be written in the following form for a perfect fluid [11, 12]: [figure omitted; refer to PDF] with the equation of state (EoS) in the internal space, [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where ω is the parameter of EoS (we should note that the pressure (4) is the intrinsic pressure of a gravitating mass in the extra dimensions and is not connected with its motion; in other words, ω is the parameter of a particle) and the rest-mass density is [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where X ~ p is a D -dimensional "radius vector" of the p th particle. In EoS, we include the factor d s / d x 0 just for convenience. We can also eliminate this factor from EoS and include it in the definition of the rest-mass density (5) (see, e.g., [11]). For our purpose, it is sufficient to consider a steady-state model. (For example, we can consider just one gravitating mass and place the origin of a reference frame on it.) That is, we disregard the spatial velocities of the gravitating masses.
In the weak-field approximation, the perturbed metric components can be written in the following form: [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where h M N ~ O ( 1 / c 2 ) and h M N ...1; g ^ N T h M T . Hereafter, the "hats" denote the unperturbed quantities. For example, the metric coefficients in (3)-(5) are already perturbed quantities.
To get the metric correction terms, we should solve (in the corresponding order) the multidimensional Einstein equation [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where S D = 2 π D / 2 / Γ ( D / 2 ) is the total solid angle (the surface area of the ( D - 1 ) -dimensional sphere of the unit radius) and G ~ ...9F; is the gravitational constant in the ( ...9F; = D + 1 ) -dimensional spacetime. For our model and up to the O ( 1 / c 2 ) terms, the Einstein equation (7) is reduced to the following system of equations (see [11] for details): [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where the Ricci-tensor components R M N [ g ( ...9F; ) ] are determined by (A.11) .
Obviously, the solution of this system is determined by the rest-mass density ρ ( X ~ ) . Let us suppose, for example, that the physically reasonable solution h 00 ( X ~ ) of (8) exists. (The exact form of such solution depends on the topology of the internal space. For example, in the case of toroidal internal spaces with the periodic boundary conditions in the directions of the extra dimensions, the corresponding solutions can be found in [13, 14]. However, as we will see later, the exact form of D -dimensional solutions is not important for our purpose. A similar situation took place in our paper [15] where this point was discussed in detail after Equation (2.56).) Then, we can write it in the form [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
It is clear that the function [straight phi] ( X ~ ) describes the nonrelativistic gravitational potential created by the system of masses with the rest-mass density (5). From (9) and (10) we get [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
It is worth noting that now we can easily determine (via the gravitational potential [straight phi] ( X ~ ) ) the functions ξ 1 , ξ 2 , and ξ 3 introduced in (A.10) .
It is well known (see, e.g., [16]) that, to be in agreement with the gravitational tests (the deflection of light and the Shapiro time-delay experiment) at the same level of accuracy as general relativity, the metric correction terms should satisfy the equalities [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
This results in the black string/brane condition [17, 18]: [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Thus, to be in agreement with observations, this parameter should not be negligibly small; that is, ω ~ O ( 1 ) .
The solutions (11)-(12) should satisfy the gauge condition (A.7) . Taking into account that h = g ^ M N h M N = [ 2 ( ω d - 1 ) / ( D - 2 + ω d ) ] h 00 , we can easily get that for N = ν ( ν = 0,1 , 2,3 ) this condition is automatically satisfied. However, in the case N = n ( n = 4,5 , ... , D ) we arrive at the condition [figure omitted; refer to PDF] Because ω ...0; 0 , to satisfy this equation, we must demand that [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Hence, the gravitational potential is the function of the spatial coordinates of the external/our space: [straight phi] ( X ~ ) = [straight phi] ( x ~ ) . Obviously, it takes place only if the rest-mass density also depends only on the spatial coordinates of the external space: ρ ( X ~ ) = ρ ( x ~ ) . In other words, the gravitating masses should be uniformly smeared over the internal space. In short, we usually call such internal spaces "smeared" extra dimensions.
This conclusion has the following important effect. Suppose that we have solved for the considered particle a multidimensional quantum Schrödinger equation and found its wave function Ψ ( X ~ ) . In general, this function depends on all spatial coordinates X ~ = ( x ~ , y ) , and we can expand it in appropriate eigenfunctions of the compact internal space, that is, in the Kaluza-Klein (KK) modes. The ground state corresponds to the absence of these particles. In this state the wave function may depend only on the coordinates x ~ of the external space. The classical rest-mass density is proportional to the probability density | Ψ | 2 . Therefore, the demand that the rest-mass density depends only on the coordinates of the external space means that the particle can be only in the ground quantum state, and KK excitations are absent. This looks very unnatural from the viewpoint of quantum and statistical physics.
3. Metric Components
Now, we want to get the expression for the metrics up to 1 / c 2 terms. Since x 0 = c t , the component g 00 should be calculated up to O ( 1 / c 4 ) : [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where h 00 ~ O ( 1 / c 2 ) and f 00 ~ O ( 1 / c 4 ) . For the rest metric coefficients, we still have (6): g M ~ N ~ [approximate] g ^ M ~ N ~ + h M ~ N ~ , h M ~ N ~ ~ O ( 1 / c 2 ) . We recall that we consider the steady-state case: g 0 M ~ = 0 .
According to the results of the previous section, the gravitating masses are uniformly smeared over the internal space. Therefore, the rest-mass density (5) now reads [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where V d = ∫ ... d ... d d y | g ( d ) | is the volume of the internal space and [figure omitted; refer to PDF] Here, x ~ is a three-dimensional radius vector in the external space. Additionally, it is clear that all prefactors ξ 1 , ξ 2 , and ξ 3 in (A.10) are also functions of the external spatial coordinates x ~ . For convenience, we redetermine the function ξ 3 : ξ 3 ( x ~ ) ...1; α ( x ~ ) . Then, h m n ( x , y ) = α ( x ) g ^ m n ( y ) , where α ( x ) ~ O ( 1 / c 2 ) .
To get the metric correction terms, we should solve the Einstein equation (7). First, we consider the O ( 1 / c 2 ) terms h M N . These terms satisfy the system (8)-(10), where we must perform the following replacements: ρ [arrow right] [varrho] 3 / V ^ d , where V ^ d = ∫ ... d ... d d y | g ^ ( d ) | is the volume of the unperturbed internal space and - ∇ ^ L ~ ∇ ^ L ~ [arrow right] Δ = δ μ ~ ν ~ ∂ 2 / ∂ x μ ~ ∂ x ν ~ . Introducing the definition h 00 ...1; 2 [straight phi] / c 2 , we can easily get from this system [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where [figure omitted; refer to PDF] is the Newtonian gravitational constant and [straight phi] ( x ~ ) is the nonrelativistic gravitational potential created by N masses. At the same time [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Now, we intend to determine the f 00 ~ O ( 1 / c 4 ) correction term. Obviously, to do it, we need to solve only the 00-component of the Einstein equation (7). Keeping in mind the prefactor 1 / c 4 in the right hand side of (7), it is clear that the energy-momentum tensor component T 00 and the trace T must be determined up to O ( 1 ) . Therefore, similar to the paper [11], we get [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
To get the Ricci-tensor component R 00 up to O ( 1 / c 4 ) , we can use (B.2) and Equations (2.29), (2.38) and (2.39) in [15] and arrive at the following formula: [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where Δ = δ μ ~ ν ~ ∂ 2 / ∂ x μ ~ ∂ x ν ~ is the 3-dimensional Laplace operator. Therefore, the 00 -component of the Einstein equation reads [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where we used the equation Δ [straight phi] = 4 π G N ∑ p = 1 N ... m p δ ( x ~ - x ~ p ) . The function [straight phi] [variant prime] ( x ~ p ) is the potential of the gravitational field at a point with the radius vector x p produced by all particles, except the p th: [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Therefore, the solution of (25) is [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Obviously, in the case of the toroidal internal space, this section reproduces the results of our paper [11]. The found metric correction terms enable us to calculate the gravitational tests (the deflection of light, the time-delay of the radar echoes, and the perihelion advance) in full analogy with the paper [18].
4. Conclusion
In our paper, we have studied the multidimensional KK model with the Ricci-flat internal space. Such models are of special interest because Calabi-Yau manifolds, which are widely used in the superstring theory [10], belong to this class. In the absence of matter sources, the background manifold is a direct product of the four-dimensional Minkowski spacetime and the Ricci-flat internal space. Then, we perturbed this background metrics by a system of gravitating masses, for example, astrophysical objects such as our Sun. It is well known that pressure inside these objects is much less than the energy density. Therefore, we supposed that gravitating masses are pressureless in the external space. However, they may have relativistic pressure in the internal space. Moreover, the presence of such pressure is the necessary condition for agreement with the gravitational tests (the deflection of light, the time-delay of the radar echoes, and the perihelion advance) [16-18]. We clearly demonstrated that metric perturbations do not depend on the coordinates of the internal space and gravitating masses are uniformly smeared over the internal space. This means, first, that KK modes corresponding to the metric fluctuations are absent and, second, the particles corresponding to the gravitating masses should be only in the ground quantum state with respect to the internal space. Of course, it looks very unnatural. According to statistical physics, any nonzero temperature should result in fluctuations, that is, in KK modes. On the other hand, the conclusion about the absence of KK particles is consistent with the results of [19, 20], where a mechanism for the symmetries formation of the internal spaces was proposed. According to this mechanism, due to the entropy decreasing in the compact subspace, its metric undergoes the process of symmetrization during some time after its quantum nucleation. A high symmetry of internal spaces actually means suppression of the extra degrees of freedom.
We also obtained the formulae for the metric correction terms. For the 00-component, we got it up to O ( 1 / c 4 ) . We found other components up to O ( 1 / c 2 ) . This enables us to calculate the gravitational tests: the deflection of light, the time-delay of the radar echoes, and the perihelion advance. It also gives a possibility to construct the Lagrange function for the considered many-body system (see, e.g., [11]).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the "Cosmomicrophysics-2" programme of the Physics and Astronomy Division of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. The work of Maxim Eingorn was supported by NSF CREST Award HRD-0833184 and NASA Grant NNX09AV07A.
[1] T. Kaluza, "On the problem of unity in physics," Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin , vol. 1921, pp. 966-972, 1921.
[2] O. Klein, "Quantum theory and five-dimensional theory of relativity," Zeitschrift für Physik , vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 895-906, 1926.
[3] N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, "The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter," Physics Letters B , vol. 429, no. 3-4, pp. 263-272, 1998.
[4] I. Antoniadis, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, "New dimensions at a millimeter to a fermi and superstrings at a TeV," Physics Letters B , vol. 436, no. 3-4, pp. 257-263, 1998.
[5] A. Salam, J. Strathdee, "On Kaluza-Klein theory," Annals of Physics , vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 316-352, 1982.
[6] P. van Nieuwenhuizen, "The complete mass spectrum of d = 11 supergravity compactified on S4 and a general mass formula for arbitrary cosets M4 ," Classical and Quantum Gravity , vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-20, 1985.
[7] H. J. Kim, L. J. Romans, P. van Nieuwenhuizen, "The mass spectrum of chiral N = 2 D = 10 supergravity on S 5 ," Physical Review D , vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 389-399, 1985.
[8] K. Hinterbichler, J. Levin, C. Zukowski, "Kaluza-Klein towers on general manifolds," http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.6353
[9] A. R. Brown, A. Dahlen, "Stability and spectrum of compactifications on product manifolds," http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.6360
[10] M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, E. Witten Superstring Theory: Loop Amplitudes, Anomalies and Phenomenology , vol. 2, of Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1987.
[11] A. Chopovsky, M. Eingorn, A. Zhuk, "Many-body problem in Kaluza-Klein models with toroidal compactification," accepted in European Physical Journal C
[12] L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, "The classical theory of fields,", vol. 2, of Course of Theoretical Physics, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 2000., 4th.
[13] M. Eingorn, A. Zhuk, "Multidimensional gravity in non-relativistic limit," Physical Review D , vol. 80, no. 12, 2009.
[14] M. Eingorn, A. Zhuk, "Non-relativistic limit of multidimensional gravity: exact solutions and applications," Classical and Quantum Gravity , vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 17, 2010.
[15] M. Eingorn, A. Zhuk, "Classical tests of multidimensional gravity: negative result," Classical and Quantum Gravity , vol. 27, no. 20, pp. 18, 2010.
[16] M. Eingorn, A. Zhuk, "Remarks on gravitational interaction in Kaluza-Klein models," Physics Letters B , vol. 713, no. 3, pp. 154-159, 2012.
[17] M. Eingorn, A. Zhuk, "Kaluza-Klein models: can we construct a viable example?," Physical Review D , vol. 83, no. 4, 2011.
[18] M. Eingorn, O. R. De Medeiros, L. C. B. Crispino, A. Zhuk, "Latent solitons, black strings, black branes, and equations of state in Kaluza-Klein models," Physical Review D , vol. 84, no. 2, 2011.
[19] A. A. Kirillov, A. A. Korotkevich, S. G. Rubin, "Emergence of symmetries," Physics Letters B , vol. 718, no. 2, pp. 237-240, 2012.
[20] K. A. Bronnikov, S. G. Rubin Black Holes, Cosmology and Extra Dimensions , World Scientific, Singapore, 2012.
Appendices
A. Ricci Tensor in the Weak-Field Approximation
In our paper we use the signature of the metrics ( + , - , - , - , ... ) and determine the Ricci-tensor components as follows: [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where the Christoffel symbols are [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
The metrics g M N ( ...9F; ) ...1; g M N is determined on ( ...9F; = 1 + D ) -dimensional manifold ... ...9F; .
Now, we suppose that the metric coefficients g M N correspond to the perturbed metrics, and in the weak-field approximation they can be decomposed as [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where g ^ M N is the background unperturbed metrics and the metric perturbations h M N ~ O ( 1 / c 2 ) ( c is the speed of light). As usual, h M N ...1; g ^ N T h T M . Here and after, the "hats" denote unperturbed quantities. Then, up to linear terms h , the Christoffel symbols read [figure omitted; refer to PDF] and for the Ricci tensor we get [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where we introduced a new tensor: [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
To get the last expression, we used the relation (91.8) in [12]. The gauge conditions (see, e.g., the paragraph 105 in [12]) [figure omitted; refer to PDF] simplify considerably this expression: [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Now, we suppose that the manifold ... ...9F; is a product manifold ... ...9F; = ... 4 × ... d with a block-diagonal background metrics of the form (1). However, in this appendix we do not assume that the internal manifold ... d is a Ricci-flat one. For the metrics (1) and an arbitrary internal space ... d , the only nonzero components of the Riemann tensor R ^ L N M P [ g ^ ( ...9F; ) ] and the Ricci tensor R ^ N M [ g ^ ( ...9F; ) ] are [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Typically, the matter, which perturbs the background metrics, is taken in the form of a perfect fluid with isotropic pressure. In the case of the product manifold, the pressure is isotropic in each factor manifold (see, e.g., the energy-momentum tensor (3)). Obviously, such perturbation does not change the topology of the model, for example, the topologies of the factor manifolds in the case of the product manifold. Additionally, it preserves also the block-diagonal structure of the metric tensor. In the case of a steady-state model (our case) the nondiagonal perturbations h 0 M ~ ( M ~ = 1,2 , 3 , ... , D ) are also absent. Therefore, the metric correction terms are conformal to the background metrics: [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where ξ 1,2 , 3 are some scalar functions of all spatial coordinates X ~ . It can be easily verified that under these conditions (it is worth noting that, as it follows from (A.8), Q M N is also equal to zero when the following condition holds: R ^ N P M L = - R ^ M P N L , resulting in the Ricci-flat space R ^ M N = 0 (but not vice versa)) the tensor Q M N in (A.8) is equal to zero: Q M N = 0 . Therefore, up to O ( 1 / c 2 ) terms, we get [figure omitted; refer to PDF] where L ~ = 1,2 , ... , D and we took into account that X 0 = c t .
B. Ricci Tensor for a Block-Diagonal Metrics
In this appendix we consider a block-diagonal metrics: [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
Then, for the Ricci-tensor components we get the following expressions: [figure omitted; refer to PDF]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright © 2013 Alexey Chopovsky et al. Alexey Chopovsky et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
We consider a multidimensional Kaluza-Klein (KK) model with a Ricci-flat internal space, for example, a Calabi-Yau manifold. We perturb this background metrics by a system of gravitating masses, for example, astrophysical objects such as our Sun. We suppose that these masses are pressureless in the external space but they have relativistic pressure in the internal space. We show that metric perturbations do not depend on coordinates of the internal space and gravitating masses should be uniformly smeared over the internal space. This means, first, that KK modes corresponding to the metric fluctuations are absent and, second, particles should be only in the ground quantum state with respect to the internal space. In our opinion, these results look very unnatural. According to statistical physics, any nonzero temperature should result in fluctuations, that is, in KK modes. We also get formulae for the metric correction terms which enable us to calculate the gravitational tests: the deflection of light, the time-delay of the radar echoes, and the perihelion advance.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer