The second and third sentences of the first paragraph of the General Behavioral Performance section of the results were incorrectly merged. The correct sentences are: Across subjects, the mean and median go trial RT were 393.6±59.7 (mean ± SD) and 376.8±60.5 ms, respectively, consistent with a right-skewed distribution of RT in an RT task [34]. The rate of successful stop trials was 48.6±2.3%, suggesting the success of the staircase procedure in eliciting errors in approximately half of the stop trials.
Table 1 and Table 2 are incorrect. The correct Table 1 and Table 2 are below.
thumbnail
Download:
*
PPT
PowerPoint slide
*
PNG
larger image
*
TIFF
original image
Table 1. Summary of Behavior Performance
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099909.t001
thumbnail
Download:
*
PPT
PowerPoint slide
*
PNG
larger image
*
TIFF
original image
Table 2. Summary of ERP Results.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099909.t002
Figure 4 is incorrect. The authors have provided a corrected version here.
thumbnail
Download:
*
PPT
PowerPoint slide
*
PNG
larger image
*
TIFF
original image
Figure 4. ERP curves during stop and go trials at Cz and Pz channels, time-locked to button press (at 0 ms).
The peak-to-peak analysis showed that ERN occurred in both SEi and SEni trials at Pz, compared to G trials. Furthermore, signed-rank test showed that ERN was greater in SEni than SEi trials at Pz. On the other hand, the peak-to-peak analysis showed that Pe occurred in both SEi (at Cz and Pz) and SEni (at Pz), compared to G trials. Furthermore, signed-rank test showed that Pe was greater in SEi than SEni at Cz. These results showed that the amplitude of Pe, not ERN, increased in stop error trials immediately preceding go trials with RT slowing.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099909.g004
1. Chang A, Chen C-C, Li H-H, Li C-SR (2014) Event-Related Potentials for Post-Error and Post-Conflict Slowing. PLoS ONE 9(6): e99909
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2014 The PLOS ONE Staff. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
