ARTICLE
Received 15 Jul 2016 | Accepted 10 Jan 2017 | Published 6 Mar 2017
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14535 OPEN
Liquid-state carbon-13 hyperpolarization generated in an MRI system for fast imaging
A.B. Schmidt1, S. Berner1,2,3, W. Schimpf1, C. Mller1,2,3, T. Lickert4, N. Schwaderlapp1, S. Knecht1, J.G. Skinner1,A. Dost1, P. Rovedo1, J. Hennig1, D. von Elverfeldt1 & J.-B. Hvener1,2
Hyperpolarized (HP) tracers dramatically increase the sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to monitor metabolism non-invasively and in vivo. Their production, however, requires an extra polarizing device (polarizer) whose complexity, operation and cost can exceed that of an MRI system itself. Furthermore, the lifetime of HP tracers is short and some of the enhancement is lost during transfer to the application site. Here, we present the production of HP tracers in water without an external polarizer: by Synthesis Amid the Magnet Bore, A Dramatically Enhanced Nuclear Alignment (SAMBADENA) is achieved within seconds, corresponding to a hyperpolarization of B20%. As transfer of the tracer is no longer required, SAMBADENA may permit a higher polarization at the time of detection at a fraction of the cost and complexity of external polarizers. This development is particularly promising in light of the recently extended portfolio of biomedically relevant para-hydrogen-tracers and may lead to new diagnostic applications.
1 Department of Radiology, Medical Physics, Medical CenterUniversity of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacherstrasse 60a, Freiburg 79106, Germany. 2 German Consortium for Cancer Research (DKTK), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120, Germany. 3 German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg 69120, Germany. 4 Division Hydrogen Technologies, Fraunhofer Institute forSolar Energy Systems (ISE), Heidenhofstra 2, Freiburg 79110, Germany. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to J.-B.H.
(email: mailto:[email protected]
Web End [email protected] ).
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8:14535 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14535 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14535
Within the past decades, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become an indispensable tool for medical diagnostics. Because of its low sensitivity, however, the
only nucleus used in clinical routine is hydrogen (1H), which is the most abundant element in vivo (B80 M) and holds the greatest gyromagnetic ratio of all stable nuclei (42
2p MHz T 1). But even for 1H, the polarization, which is the fraction of all spins contributing to the MR signal, does not exceed 3 p.p.m. in a magnetic eld of 1 T. All other stable nuclei have a lower polarization and much lower abundance in vivo.
Still, the need for a non-invasive tool for chemical analysis in vivo, for example to measure the metabolism and treatment response of tumors1, is great. It appears that this need is precisely met by magnetic resonance (MR) spectroscopy, which is very successful for chemical analysis in vitro. However, low sensitivity makes its use in clinical routines very limited2. Nuclear hyperpolarization (HP) promises to overcome this hurdle and has enabled MR signal enhancement by several orders of magnitude3. The MR signal of most X-nuclei (nuclei other than protons) in vivo is low and thus both distribution and metabolism of magnetically labelled or hyperpolarized X-nuclei can be observed without signicant background, similar to positron emission tomography. The rst human studies of this method have shown very promising results4,5 and more are underway.
The most prominent techniques for the production of hyperpolarized 13C-tracers are dissolution dynamic nuclear polarization (dDNP)6 and parahydrogen (pH2) and synthesis allows dramatically enhanced nuclear alignment (PASADENA)7, also known as pH2-induced polarization (PHIP)8. dDNP achieves liquid-state polarization by transferring polarization from electrons to nuclei in the solid state at a temperature of a few K and in a strong magnetic eld of a few T, followed by rapid dissolution. PHIP, in contrast, is the only technique to date that allows polarization to take place in the liquid state, either by hydrogenation7 or reversible exchange with pH2 (ref. 9). While dDNP is the only technique commercially available and used for human applications, it is associated with rather high cost, a relatively low output and long polarization cycles, although many promising attempts are being pursued to overcome these shortcomings1012. PHIP, in contrast, is more cost efcient, very fast and requires less hardware. A hitherto substantial drawback of this techniqueits limited portfolio of tracersmay have been overcome by the discovery of new agents1315 and side-arm hydrogenation PHIP (PHIP-SAH), which has enabled the polarization of acetate and pyruvate16. Both methods share the
disadvantage that the HP-tracer has to be produced in a dedicated polarizing device (polarizer) outside of the MRI system3,6,1729. During the ensuing transfer through varying magnetic elds to the application site, inevitably, some of the polarization is lost to the T1 decay towards thermal equilibrium.
Here, we present a new method that achieves 13C-HP in excess of 20% in aqueous solution within seconds in the bore of a commercial MRI system. No external polarizer is neededthe only items that are required, in addition to an MRI scanner, are pH2, a reaction chamber, some valves and a digital output to control the process. By Synthesis Amid the Magnet Bore, A Dramatically Enhanced Nuclear Alignment (SAMBADENA) is obtained. By producing a sterile HP-tracer in situ, within the bore of an MRI, at the application site and at high eld, this new method addresses some of the aforementioned shortcomings of dDNP and PHIP.
ResultsSAMBADENA produces high and reproducible in-bore 13C-HP. A maximum theoretical polarization yield of 48.7% was simulated for 1-13C hydroxyenthyl-propionate (HEP), a tracer that was previously used for in vivo angiography27,30. The corresponding evolution intervals for the spin-order-transfer (SOT) sequence l-PH-INEPT (longitudinal-para-hydrogen-insensitive nuclei
enhancement by polarization transfer) were t1 69.8 ms and
t2 38.9 ms (total 108.7 ms). Several other polarization maxima
were found but required longer evolution intervals (Fig. 1). The polarization yield was found to be relatively stable with respect to errors of J-couplings, pulses and evolution times (Fig. 1).
Experimentally, HP was produced within an MRI system by using the available hardware of the system itself (Fig. 2). The signal that was directly produced by the PH-INEPT sequence
was quantied and corresponded to a nuclear polarization of P 24%, approximately half of the theoretical maximum. This
polarization level corresponds to an enhancement factor of ZE40,000 for 13C at 7 T (hydrogenation time th 4s, 5.54 mM
HEP in H2O; Fig. 3).
The inter-day yield and reproducibility of SAMBADENA was quantied in nine experiments to PE(212) % with 5.54 mM
HEP in H2O (Fig. 4).
Production of longitudinal hyperpolarization by l-PH-INEPT .
While a polarization of the order of few per cent is sufcient for biomedical use3,31, the short-lived transversal polarization generated by the PH-INEPT sequence is not suited for
a b
115
Variation of J, [afii9825] Variation of intervals
0.48
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.45
0.2
J - couplings (%)
110
105
100
95
90
0.46
0.44
0.42
0.4
0.45
0.48
0.45
Polarization
t 1 (s)
0.15
Polarization
0.1
0.48
0.45
0.05
0.45
0
0
90 95 100 105 110 Flip angle [afii9825] (%)
0.2 t2 (s)
0.05
0.1
0.15
Figure 1 | Simulated stability and intervals of l-PHINEPT for SAMBADENA. The resulting polarization of the SOT sequence l-PH-INEPT (longitudinal-
parahydrogen-insensitive nuclei enhancement by polarization transfer) was simulated as function of erroneous J-couplings and ip angles (a) and as function of the evolution intervals (b). J represents the J-couplings of the simplied 3-spin- system of the tracer and a represents the ip angle of the pulses of the sequence; both values were varied by15%. The values of t1 and t2 denote the free evolution intervals between the effective pulses of the SOT sequence (see Fig. 8).
2 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8:14535 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14535 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14535 ARTICLE
Magnetic valve
Dual channel volume MR coil Reaction chamber
MRI system
30
20
Polarization (%)
10
0 Day 1 Day 2 Mean
Figure 4 | SAMBADENA reproducibility: A mean polarization ofP (212) % was achieved in nine experiments on 2 days. Error bars
correspond to the s.d. of the respective day or, in case of the mean, all experiments (reaction temperature TE80 C, hydrogenation time th 4 s,
concentration of substrate cHEP 5.54 mM).
20
10
pH2 reservoir
Pressure out
pH2 in
Figure 2 | HP without a polarizer: Schematic view of the experimental setup, where the HP-tracer is produced in situ within the MRI close to the application site. The essential components comprise the reaction chamber, valves, tubing, pH2 and the MRI system. The latter is used to transfer the spin order and to detect the hyperpolarized signal.
0.5
13 C-polarization (%)
1-13C,2,3,3-2H3-hydroxyethyl-propionate 4 mol, single scan
116 mmol, 10 summated scans
0.0
0 0 60 120 180
Time (s)
1.0
NMR signal (a.u.)
Acetone (1.1 atom % 2-13C)
Figure 5 | The lifetime of the polarization is long at high eld. The decay of one sample of hyperpolarized 13C-HEP was monitored by acquiring 12 non-localized spectra with a repetition time of TR 15 s and a small ip
angle of 9 (squares). A mono-exponential decay function (line) was tted to the data and yielded T1B(792) s. A correction factordescribed in the methodswas applied to each data point to compensate for the fact that each measurement pulse consumes a nite amount of the magnetization. The T1 determined from the low ip angle measurement correlates well to the polarizations that were detected by full, 90 excitations 0, 20 and 120 s after the HP. For each time point, the mean of three measurements (bars) is shown, and error bars indicate the s.d. The tracer concentration was5.54 mM in D2O.
220 210 200 190 180Chemical shift ( p.p.m.)
Figure 3 | 13C-HP generated inside an MRI system. Non-localized
13C-spectra of thermally polarized acetone at natural abundance (red) and
13C-HEP in aqueous solution (black) hyperpolarized by SAMBADENA within an MRI system. The polarization yield was quantied to B24%, which corresponds to a B40,000-fold enhancement of the thermal
13C-polarization which amounts toB6 p.p.m. at 7 T.
in vivo applicationlongitudinal magnetization is required instead. As predicted by Bar et al.32, the l-PH-INEPT
sequence enabled the production of longitudinal magnetization hyperpolarized to a similar level, P (192) % (detected 2 s after
generation, for 5.54 mM HEP in D2O) (Fig. 5). This magnetization decayed much slower with T1 (instead of T2) and enabled other experiments as described in the following.
SAMBADENA enables magnetization storage at high eld. The T1 of HEP dissolved in D2O was measured to (792) s at 7 T (Fig. 5), which is more than the 70 s reported at 4.7 T (ref. 26). In degassed and deionized H2O, the T1 of HEP at 7 T was measured to (755) s, which is less than (1017) s reported at 48 mT (ref. 19). These long relaxation times are advantageous with
respect of the further use of the tracer. If, for example, 20 s were to be used for the injection of the tracer in vivo, only about one fth of the initial polarization would be lost.
Optimized reaction conditions. As expected and reported before18, the hydrogenation time had a strong impact on the HP yield: the highest polarizations were observed between th 48 s
(Fig. 6). Note that considerable polarization, about half of the maximum, was observed after hydrogenation periods th as long as 15 s. The slow decay is likely attributed to the decay of the para-order of the hydrogens that were added to the tracer. Note that no refocusing or decoupling pulses were applied during th.
The apparent build-up hydrogenation time constant of the catalysis (Tcat) and para-order relaxation constant (Tpara) were estimated to Tcat (1.60.9) s and Tpara (166) s, respec
tively, by tting a model to the experimental data (equation (2) in Methods). The onset of the hydrogenation reaction (t0) extracted from the t was t0 (1.00.5) s. This value reects the nite
time required for the hydrogen being delivered to the reactor, to enter the solution, to build-up pressure and to start the reaction.
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8:14535 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14535 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 3
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14535
It is supported by a high-speed video of the hydrogenation reaction, where the bubbling came to a stop B1 s after the injection, indicating an equilibration of the pressure (Supplementary Movie 1). Disregarding the contribution of relaxation, the asymptotic maximum polarization level extracted from the t was (275) % (goodness of the t: R2 0.7, concentrations of
HEP and catalyst of cHEP 5.5 mM and ccat 2.1 mM). The
deviation to the theoretical maximum may be attributed to noise in the data, relaxation before and during the SOT-sequence itself or experimental imperfections.
This data indicates that after th 4 s, (8518) % of all
molecules are hydrogenated. Since 100% hydrogenation is assumed for the quantication of the polarization yield, it is likely that the reported polarization is underestimated. Note that Tcat, Tpara, maximum polarization level and the optimal th are expected to be dependent on concentrations of the precursor and catalyst.
Hyperpolarization at elevated tracer concentrations. For any biomedical application, highly concentrated, highly hyperpolarized samples are needed to achieve sufcient signal. By variation of th, the catalyst concentration (ccat) and reaction pressure (p), the polarization achieved for 80 mM tracer was increased from3.4 to 7.1% and eventuallyB13% (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1). It must be noted, though, that the last measurement could not be repeated because the pressure exceeded the specications of the current instrumentation and caused damage to the equipment. In addition, PE17% was readily achieved in a sample of 22 mM, 3.5 cm off the isocentre of the magnet.
SAMBADENA and ex vivo 13C-MRI. To demonstrate the feasibility of simultaneous HP and MRI, HEP was hyperpolarized by SAMBADENA within seconds, injected into a rat post mortem and 13C-MRI was acquired (rattus rattus, 7 days old). The rat was placed next to the reaction chamber and positioned in the sensitive volume of the coil within the magnet (Fig. 7a,b). In contrast to all other experiments, in this setting, the reaction chamber was not in the isocentre, but at a distance of 3.5 cm along the z axis of the magnet. At this position, the SOT sequence was still efcient, as demonstrated by an HP of 17% that was achieved for 22 mM HEP in 700 ml aqueous solution in the reactor (Table 1).
For ex vivo MRI, a catheter was connected to the outlet of the reaction chamber and inserted into the thorax of the rat. The HP-experiment was repeated and B330 ml of the hyperpolarized tracer were injected through the catheter into the rat without leaving the magnet. Sub-second 13C-MRI was acquired and strong, hyperpolarized signal was observed (Fig. 7c). The co-registration with a T2-weighted 1H-MRI (Fig. 7d,e) showed that the 13C-signal was localized around the heart of the animal and within the reaction chamber, with a maximum 13C-signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of 113 and 111, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 1). In the same scan, the SNR in the model solution was quantied to 9. A Zero-Echo-Time (ZTE) MRI33 was acquired afterwards to depict the entire setup (Fig. 7f).
DiscussionSAMBADENA enables the HP of 13C-labelled tracers to high levels, in aqueous solution, within seconds and within the magnet bore next to the application site. For the rst time, high 13C-HP was achieved without a dedicated polarizerthe hardware of an MRI system was used instead. This method circumvents some of the shortcomings that are associated with current 13C-HP methods, foremost the need of a dedicated, expensive and complex external polarizer and lengthy transfer of the sample. Other challenges persist and are discussed in the following.
Obtaining a pure solution devoid of the catalyst is a persisting challenge for all pH2-based HP methods, although strong progress was reported recently by using either heterogeneous catalysts3437 or a biphasic approach38. The latter appears to be particularly promising with respect to the implementation in the presented setup, and heterogeneous catalysts are currently being investigated in our laboratory.
Whereas other HP methods require an extra polarizer device whose complexity, operation and cost can exceed that of the MRI scanner itself, the additional equipment needed here is very little. The only extra component that is needed inside the magnet is a reaction chamber. In the experiments presented here, the bulk reactor occupies less than one-third of the imaging eld of view (FOV). A signicant reduction in size appears feasible because the actual inner volume of the reactor is less than 1/100 of the FOV
20
10
0
Polarization (%)
0
Figure 6 | Hydrogenation time affects polarization. Mean 13C-HP
(columns) and s.d. (error bars) of HEP (1-13C HEP) as a function of hydrogenation time (th) and t (line). In agreement with earlier reports18, the optimum th was between 48 s. The time constants for the catalytic hydrogenation reaction, Tcat (1.60.9) s, and the para-order relaxation,
Tpara (166) s, were extracted from a model tted to the data. The model
is described in Methods (equation (2)). Each time point was measured three times.
Table 1 | Experimental parameters and corresponding polarization yields.
P (%) p(pH2) (bar) ccat (mM) cHEP (mM) th (s) Solvent3.4 15 2.1 80 4 D2O
7.1 15 2.1 80 8 D2O
13 30 4.2 80 8 H2O
17 15 4.2 22 5 H2O
The hyperpolarization of HEP (13C-hydroxyethyl-propionate) at a concentration of c 80 mM was increased by variation of the para-hydrogen pressure (p(pH )), the concentrations of the catalyst
(c ) and the hydrogenation time (t ).
4 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8:14535 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14535 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14535 ARTICLE
MRI system Reaction chamber
Animal 'bed'
Dual channel volume MR coil
R
1
3
2
M
V
a
3D view
b
Schematic setting
1 cm
2
1
3
FOV
V
c d e f
13C RARE MRI
1H T2w MRI 13C 1H (T2w) 13C 1H (ZTE)
Figure 7 | Simultaneous 13C-HP and ex vivo imaging: The compact design of the setup enabled SAMBADENA next to a small rat post mortem in the sensitive volume of the magnet (a,b). Within seconds, the 13C-tracer HEP was polarized to B17% at a concertation of 22 mM. Without leaving the magnet,
B330 ml of the tracer were injected into the rat, and strong 13C signal with a maximum SNR of 113 was observed by MRI acquired in 0.5 s (c). Subsequently, a T2-weighted 1H-MRI (d) and 1H Zero-Echo-Time (ZTE) MRI were recorded. Co-registration of 1H and 13C-data revealed the location of the tracer, in the reaction chamber and surrounding the heart of the animal (e,f). The isocenter of the magnet is the center of the images. R, reactor; FOV, eld of view; M, Model Solution M3; 1, 2, 3: lines for pressure relieve, pH2 supply and pH2 injection, respectively.
(2 cm3 versus 342 cm3). The only requirement for the MRI system is a 13C channel, which is necessary for 13C-MRI in general.
A relatively large volume transmitter is advantageous to enable simultaneous application of the SOT and MRI sequence. A dedicated pickup coil at the region of interest (ROI) may assure a high sensitivity while the homogeneous excitation of the large volume coil (covering both chamber and animal) would be maintained. To improve the accuracy of the applied pulse sequences, two different shim settings were used; one for the HP and one for the imaging.
SAMBADENA may be simplied further by using the digital outputs of the MRI system to control the valves; its implementation on any commercial multinuclear MRI system appears feasible. Other pH2-based approaches are much less cost intensive than dDNP, but still require an external polarizer device with the associated cost and complexity1723,2629.
While the actual HP process is executed with a single button, the production of pH2 and precursor solution requires some training. In the future, both pH2 and solution may be prepared elsewhere and shipped to the application site. At this stage, the catalystsubstrate solution is lled manually into the reactor outside the scanner. We envision that future implementations will feature in-bore loading, automatic heating and likely automated injection18.
Any preparation of the hyperpolarized tracer, such as cooling or quality control, would take place at the elevated eld of the host MRI system where the T1 is long (here:B80 s). Note, however, that any human application would require fast and comprehensive testing of the solution before injection, to ensure the safety of the patient, which is challenging especially in the magnet bore.
The HP levels reached B20% for a tracer concentration of 6
and 22 mM, and 13% for 80 mMare likely sufcient for a meaningful in vivo application, in particular because no lengthy transfer of the tracer through varying magnetic elds is necessary.
The SOT-sequence l-PH-INEPT was implemented for the
rst time, and about half of the theoretically achievable polarization yield was observed (P (192) %). Other sequences
with a higher theoretical yield appear feasible and may improve the polarization as well.
Fast hydrogenation at elevated temperature and high pressure was found to be essential for a high polarization (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 1). The catalytic hydrogenation time constant extracted from experimental data indicated that (8518) % of a5.5 mM precursor solution were hydrogenated after a 4 s reaction at 15 bar andB80 C. Especially with respect to a high substrate concentration, an even higher pressure and temperature is expected to improve the yield further (see Supplementary Fig. 1).
Polarization losses may be attributed to relaxation before, during and after the polarization transfer, imperfect pulses, timings (or erroneous J-coupling constants) and incomplete hydrogenation. We observed that the reaction chamber distorted the line shape of a model solution, which may also cause polarization loss (see Supplementary Figs 3 and 4). Note that 100% hydrogenation and pH2 enrichment was assumed for the quantication, which results in some underestimation of the reported polarization.
The technical feasibility of using the MRI simultaneously for the HP and subsequent imaging was demonstrated by an ex vivo experiment (Fig. 7). Although there appears to be no fundamental hurdle for a preclinical in vivo application, the following aspects have to be taken into account: First, the equipment to support the animal (anaesthesia, vital sign monitoring, heating) have to t into the bore along with the animal and the reactor. This issue may be addressed by employing a smaller reactor designed to be used with a commercial animal bed. Second, the injection needs to be well controlled regarding ow, pressure and total volume. An automated injection system for dDNP that was already described and evaluated positively in many in vivo experiments39 may be used here. Third, unwanted heating of the animal (by the reactor) should be avoided, and the HP-solution needs to be cooled to temperature that is acceptable for injection. This rst implementation was not designed with an in vivo demonstration in mind, but the temperature at the position of the animal is close to the required range (measured as 42 to 37 C as a function of distance from the outside wall of the reactor, see Supplementary
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8:14535 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14535 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 5
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14535
Fig. 5). The temperature at the position of the animal may be reduced further by adding insulation and/or using a different method of heating. As for the temperature of the solution, an elevated temperature is required only at the time of the hydrogenation (to provide fast catalysis, a high polarization yield and sterilize the tracer solution, see Supplementary Note 1). The temperature of the tracer exiting the catheter used in vitro was measured to (433)C and was further reduced to (323)C by guiding the catheter through iced water (Supplementary Table 2). Thus, it appears feasible to reach an acceptable temperature within seconds. Current work focuses on adapting SAMBADENA for the HP of biomolecules to conduct metabolic studies in vivo.
A major limitation of pH2-based methods was the hitherto restricted portfolio of relevant tracers. However, this hurdle may have been overcome by the HP of pyruvate and acetate16, phospholactate1315, and (diethyl-) succinate1,4043 with pH2.
Current work focuses on adapting SAMBADENA to these tracers.
Compared with other methods, the HP of a liquid-state tracer next to the application site may enable the delivery of higher polarization in vivo at the time of detection, especially for agents with short relaxation time T1 (such as glucose), and enable better resolution of metabolites with hitherto low SNR.
Given its simplicity, its high polarization yield, fast production and low cost, SAMBADENA may have an important impact on the research of HP tracers, which hold the potential to revolutionize the use of MRI in modern diagnostics.
Methods
Parahydrogen production. pH2 was enriched to B95% similar as descried previously and stored in aluminium bottle to be used on demand44.
Experimental setup. Measurements were performed using a 7 T preclinical small animal MRI system (Biospec 7/20, PV5.1, Bruker, Germany), using a dual-resonant
1H13C transmit-receive volume coil (Rapid, Germany; Fig. 2).
A reaction chamber with an inner volume of B2 ml was custom-made from polysulfone (PSU 1000) to allow a high hydrogenation temperature (B80 C) and pressure (B15 bar). Tubes were connected to the inlet at the bottom (1/8 1/16,
PTFE, SCP GmbH, Germany) and outlet at the top (1/16 0.75 mm, PTFE, SCP
GmbH, Germany) to inject and release pH2, respectively. Both tubes were connected to magnetic valves (type 0124, Brkert, Germany) outside of the MR system. The valves were controlled by a custom-written software (MATLAB, MathWorks, USA) using the digital outputs of a data acquisition board (DAQ 6125, National Instruments, USA). A second reactor was used for hydrogenation experiments (Fig. 6) and ex vivo MRI experiments, where an additional outlet at the bottom served to inject the tracer into the animal (Fig. 7).
Preparation of the samples. A rhodium-based catalyst was prepared fresh by mixing a biphosphine ligand (1,4-bis-[(phenyl-3-propane sulfonate) phosphine] butane disodium salt, Q36333, MW 562.53 g mol 1, Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA)
with a rhodium complex (bis(norbornadiene)rhodium (I) tetrauoroborate,MW 373.99 g mol 1, CAS 36620-11-8, StremChemicals, MA, USA) in degassed
D2O (Deuterium oxide, 99.9 atom % D, CAS 7789-20-0, Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA) or degassed and deionized H2O (ref. 17).
In contrast to previous reports17,26, the rhodium moiety was dissolved in warm H2O/D2O (B60 C) instead of acetone.
1-13C, 2,3,3-2H3-hydroxyethyl-acrylate (HEA, 99% 13C, MW 120.13 g mol 1,
CAS: 1216933-17-3, Sigma Aldrich, USA) was added to the solution. During the HP experiment, pH2 was added to HEA and 1-13C, 2,3,3-2H3-HEP was formed (Fig. 8).
To achieve a high hydrogenation temperature, but to avoid degeneration of the catalyst18, a stock solution containing catalyst and substrate at high concentrations was prepared and kept at room temperature (concentrations: crhodium 21 mM,
cligand 23 mM, cHEA 55.4 mM). The reaction chamber was heated in a water
bath to B9095 C. Shortly before the experiment, one part (100 ml) of the stock and nine parts of hot H2O or D2O (B90 C) were lled into the reaction chamber and placed in the MRI scanner. Unless otherwise indicated, the nal concentration was 2.1 mM for the catalyst (with 10% excess of the ligand) and 5.54 mM of HEA.
For the experiment with elevated tracer concentrations, the required amount of HEA was added to the reactor afterwards (for example 9 mg to reach 80 mM in 1 ml solvent).
This procedure permitted obtaining a high hydrogenation temperature of 480 C, while keeping the catalyst at room temperature for most of the time18.
Spin order transfer. Both PH-INEPT (ref. 45) and l-PH-INEPT (ref. 31)
sequences were implemented on the MRI system. The PH-INEPT sequence,
which consists of three excitation pulses (45y-1H, 90y-1H and 90x-13C) interleaved by two refocusing pulses (180 on 1H and 13C), was used to transform the para-spin order into hyperpolarized transversal 13C magnetization (Fig. 8). The transversal magnetization generated by this method is short-lived and decays with T2*. The l-PH-INEPT (ref. 31) sequence, instead, generates long-lasting
longitudinal magnetization by the addition of an extra 90y-13C pulse to PH-INEPT . Note that the evolution intervals between the pulses of the sequences
(t1 and t2) depend on the hydrogen-hydrogen- and hydrogen-carbon J-couplings of the target molecule.
Quantum mechanical simulations were carried out to optimize t1 and t2 and to determine the theoretical polarization yield. The simulations were performed using the product operator and density matrix formalism in a reduced spin system containing the two para-hydrogens and the target nucleus 13C (J-couplings:JH-H 7.57 Hz, JH1-C 7.24 Hz JH2-C 5.62 Hz)46. It was assumed that only
longitudinal spin order survives the hydrogenation process, and that evolution takes place under the isotropic liquid-state Hamiltonian. The optimal timings with respect to the highest polarization yield were obtained by numerical optimization. Relaxation was neglected and rotation operators were applied to mimic the effect of radio frequency pulses. To assess the effect of erroneous intervals, ip angles and J-couplings, these parameters were varied31,47.
MR settings. For in vitro experiments, 1 ml of H2O was lled into the reactor and placed in the isocentre of the scanner (referred to as position 1) to match and tune the coil and to adjust the frequency and eld homogeneity (iterative rst-order shim). The 1H frequency was manually set to B2.8 p.p.m. The 13C frequency was set to B185 p.p.m., the chemical shift of 1-13C HEP, using the 13CO-resonance of acetone (referred to as model solution M1, 1.1 atom % natural abundance of carbon-13, 8 ml, concentration of B14 M, chemical shift of the 13CO resonance 210 p.p.m.).
The 13C ip angle was calibrated manually using free induction decays with varying pulse power and an 8 ml sample of ethanol at natural abundance (reference pulse gains for a 1 ms, 90 pulse of 53.6 W (17.2 dB) for 1H and 163.5 W (8.2 dB) for 13C).
For the imaging experiments, the reactor was placed at a distance of 3.5 cm to the isocentre (referred to as position 2). The 1H and 13C ip angles were calibrated using a model solution containing 667 mg 1-13C sodium acetate in 2 ml deionized H2O (denoted as model solution M2, longitudinal relaxation time T1 (221) s
(see Supplementary Fig. 6), 99 atom % 13C, MW 83.03 g mol 1, c 4 M, CAS
23424-28-4, Sigma Aldrich, USA) in a cutoff 10 mm nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) tube that was placed within the reaction chamber. Compared with the ip angles measured at position 1, deviations of 1% for 1H and 18% for 13C were found (reference pulse gains of 54.2 W (17.1 dB) for 1H and 190.5 W (7.1 dB) for 13C (Supplementary Fig. 7).
Before HP, the rst-order shims and frequencies were adjusted for the reactor and the rat using a PRESS48 localization. Both settings were saved and loaded before HP or imaging was conducted.
The receiver gain was set to 64 dB for all 13C-experiments.
180
180
180
Pulse amplitude (a.u.)
13 C-Channel1 H-Channel
90y
90x
+
45y
180
MMR signal
(a.u.)
Time
t1 t2
Detection
Figure 8 | Schematic view of the HP method: The tracer to-behyperpolarized is formed by catalytic addition of pH2 to an unsaturated precursor molecule (a, here: hydroxyethyl-acrylate forms the angiography-tracer27,30 HEP). Next, a pulse sequence is applied subsequently to transfer
the spin order (grey bars, here: PH-INEPT (ref. 45)), and the enhanced
13C signal is recorded (c). In b, refocusing pulses are shown in light grey. (c) Real 13C-data in the time domain acquired after one HP experiment.
Hydrogenation SOT
a b
c
6 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8:14535 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14535 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14535 ARTICLE
Hyperpolarization. After the reactor was lled with the precursor solution, closed and placed in the magnet, the automated HP procedure was started, consisting of the following steps: First, the hydrogenation reaction was initialized by injecting pH2 at 15 bar (unless indicated otherwise) for a period of 2 s, followed by a variable delay of 112 s, yielding a total hydrogenation time of th 314 s. Next, the
SOT-sequence was executed (B100 ms). If the PH-INEPT sequence was used,
the 13C signal was detected directly at the end of t2; if l-PH-INEPT was applied,
the magnetization was read out after another delay td, either by non-localized spectroscopy or imaging. Note that B300 ml of the solution was ushed into the outlet tube during the hydrogenation.
Longitudinal relaxation time T1. After an l-PH-INEPT experiment, the
T1 of HEP in D2O and H2O was measured by probing the decaying longitudinal magnetization with small-angle acquisitions of 9, interleaved by 15 s (D2O) or 5 s (H2O). T1 was extracted from an exponential decay function
S(t) S0 exp( t/T1) cos(a)n 1, where S(t) is the acquired signal, S0 is the signal
at t 0, a the ip angle (9) and n the number of the pulse of the series. The
absolute polarization of this scan was estimated using the signal of the rst acquisition and a. Note, that the data points in Fig. 5 were corrected for polarization loss induced by the previous excitations by dividing the measured signals by cos(a)n 1.
Quantication of HP. The absolute polarization yield P was quantied with respect to the signal of a thermally polarized sample (M1) for the in vitro experiments, and a model solution containing 333 mg 1-13C sodium acetate dissolved in 1.2 ml deionized H2O (denoted as model solution M3, concentration of sodium acetate of c 3.3 M) for the ex vivo experiments:
P P
therm
Nref
NHP
F13Cref
F13CHP
cref
cHP
Vref
VHP
SHP
Sref 1
where HP and ref indicate a value of the hyperpolarized sample and the reference model solution, N is the number of summated scans (1 for all HP experiments), F13C is the atomic fraction of the 13C isotope, c is the concentration of the molecule,
V is the volume of the sample, S the measured 13C-NMR signal and a the excitation ip angle, Ptherm is the thermal 13C-polarization at 7T and room temperature (B6 p.p.m.). Note that 100% pH2 enrichment and complete hydrogenation was assumed, which results in an underestimation of the HP that was actually achieved.
The NMR signals were numerically integrated after multiplication with an exponential function (10 Hz), Fourier-transformation and automated phase and baseline correction (Topspin 2.0, Bruker, Germany).
Hydrogenation. The quantication of the hydrogenation yield by NMR of the samples after HP is problematic because the hydrogenation reaction continues after HP. Indeed, complete conversion was found in all samples investigated. Attempts to monitor the conversion during the reaction failed because of low signal (localized spectroscopy, PRESS at 9.4T andB100 mM substrate concentration) or strong distortions of the resonances (non-localized spectroscopy).
Instead, the HP yield (P) was recorded as a function of the hydrogenation time th at otherwise identical conditions. From the resulting data, an apparent para-order relaxation time Tpara and a hydrogenation constant Tcat were obtained: we hypothesize that P is governed by a saturated growth described by Tcat and a mono-
exponential decay of the para-order (Tpara) after the hydrogenation occurred. By solving the differential equations describing the chemical kinetics, an analytical expression for P(th) was derived and tted to the experimental data. The function
P(th) reads:
P th
b Tcat
Tpara 1exp th t0 Tcat
: 2 The coefcients b and t0 allow the maximum polarization level to be adjusted and a time delay between the application of pH2 pressure and the onset of the hydrogenation reaction, respectively.
Ex vivo experiments. An ex vivo rat (rattus rattus, 35 g, 7 cm, 7 days old) and model solution M3 were placed next to the reaction chamber. An injection hose (42 cm, 1/16, PTFE, SCP GmbH, Germany) was connected to the outlet of the reactor and inserted into the thorax of the rat. The setup was positioned in the coil within the MRI system. The reactor was at a distance of 3.5 cm from the isocentre (position 2). The eld homogeneity was optimized for two volumes, the position of the reactor and the entire rat. The settings were saved and loaded when needed. After the HP, pH2 pressure was released, and a manual valve (V in Fig. 7) was actuated to inject the HP-tracer directly into the rat without leaving the magnet.
Two-dimensional single-shot RARE (rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement)49 images were acquired before, as well asB10 s and B41 s after the
HP was generated (90/180, RARE factor 38, partial Fourier factor 1.7778, 38 96
matrix, FOV (8.4 cm)2, zero-lled to 128 128, (0.65 mm)2 in-plane resolution,
6-cm-slice thickness, acquisition time/TR 0.487 s, TE 79 ms, acquisition time
487 ms, bandwidth 10 kHz, centred in the isocentre).
Subsequently, a T2-weighted, two-dimensional, 1H-Turbo-RARE sequence was acquired with the same in-plane FOV for anatomical reference (90/180, RARE
factor 8, bandwidth 46.9 kHz, matrix 2562, in-plane resolution (328 mm)2,TR 2.5 s, TE 33 ms, acquisition time 80 s, 15 slices 1 mm thick, 1.5 mm apart,
centred in the isocenter).
A ZTE MRI was acquired to display the reaction chamber and rat simultaneously (2.3, matrix 1283, FOV 16.8 cm, TR 4 ms, acquisition time 208 s,
bandwidth 300 kHz, 51,896 projections, centred in the isocentre).
The SNR was calculated by dividing the maximum signal intensity of a chosen ROI by the standard deviation of the noise (paravision 5.1, Bruker, Germany) (Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 1). For the co-registration, black was set transparent in the 13C image (Fig. 7) (GNU image manipulation program). The ZTE data are shown as a max. intensity projection (imageJ50). The images were composed with Inkscape.
Data availability. The authors declare that all relevant data presented here are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
1. Kurhanewicz, J. et al. Analysis of cancer metabolism by imaging hyperpolarized nuclei: prospects for translation to clinical research. Neoplasia 13, 8197 (2011).
2. Xu, V. et al. MR spectroscopy in diagnosis and neurological decision-making. Semin. Neurol. 28, 407422 (2008).
3. Ardenkjaer-Larsen, J. H. et al. Dynamic nuclear polarization polarizer for sterile use intent. NMR Biomed. 24, 927932 (2011).
4. Nelson, S. J. et al. Metabolic imaging of patients with prostate cancer using hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 108 (2013).
5. Cunningham, C. H. et al. Hyperpolarized 13C metabolic MRI of the human heartinitial experience. Circ. Res. 119, 11771182 (2016).
6. Ardenkjr-Larsen, J. H. et al. Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of 410,000 times in liquid-state NMR. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1015810163 (2003).
7. Bowers, C. R. & Weitekamp, D. P. Parahydrogen and synthesis allow dramatically enhanced nuclear alignment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 55415542 (1987).
8. Eisenschmid, T. C. et al. Para hydrogen induced polarization in hydrogenation reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 80898091 (1987).
9. Adams, R. W. et al. Reversible interactions with para-hydrogen enhance NMR sensitivity by polarization transfer. Science 323, 17081711 (2009).
10. Comment, A. et al. Producing over 100 ml of highly concentrated hyperpolarized solution by means of dissolution DNP. J. Magn. Reson. 194, 152155 (2008).
11. Batel, M. et al. A multi-sample 94 GHz dissolution dynamic-nuclear-polarization system. J. Magn. Reson. 214, 166174 (2012).
12. Bornet, A. et al. Boosting dissolution dynamic nuclear polarization by cross polarization. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 4, 111114 (2013).
13. Shchepin, R. V., Coffey, A. M., Waddell, K. W. & Chekmenev, E. Y. PASADENA Hyperpolarized 13C Phospholactate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 39573960 (2012).
14. Shchepin, R. V., Pham, W. & Chekmenev, E. Y. Dephosphorylation and biodistribution of 1-13C-phospholactate in vivo. J. Label. Compd. Radiopharm. 57, 517524 (2014).
15. Shchepin, R. V., Coffey, A. M., Waddell, K. W. & Chekmenev, E. Y. Parahydrogen induced polarization of 1-13C-phospholactate-d2 for biomedical imaging with 430,000,000-fold NMR Signal Enhancement in Water. Anal.
Chem. 86, 56015605 (2014).16. Reineri, F., Boi, T. & Aime, S. ParaHydrogen Induced Polarization of 13C carboxylate resonance in acetate and pyruvate. Nat. Commun. 6, 5858 (2015).
17. Hvener, J.-B. et al. PASADENA hyperpolarization of 13C biomolecules: equipment design and installation. Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. 22, 111121 (2009).
18. Kadlecek, S. et al. A simple and low-cost device for generating hyperpolarized contrast agents using parahydrogen. NMR Biomed. 24, 3342 (2011).
19. Waddell, K. W., Coffey, A. M. & Chekmenev, E. Y. In situ detection of PHIP at 48 mT: demonstration using a centrally controlled polarizer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 97101 (2011).
20. Wagner, S., Agraz, J. & Li, D. Devices and methods for parahydrogen induced polarization. US patent 2,217,262 (2015).
21. Agraz, J., Grunfeld, A. M., Cunningham, K., Li, D. & Wagner, S. Improved PHIP polarization using a precision, low noise, voltage controlled current source. J. Magn. Reson. 7784 (2013).
22. Agraz, J. et al. LabVIEW-based control software for para-hydrogen induced polarization instrumentation. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 044705 (2014).
23. Agraz, J. et al. PHIP instrumentation pinch valve system for sample delivery, process and collection. Adv. Biomed. Sci. Eng. 1, 818 (2014).
24. Comment, A. et al. Principles of operation of a DNP prepolarizer coupled to a rodent MRI scanner. Appl. Magn. Reson. 34, 313319 (2008).
25. Jannin, S. et al. A 140 GHz prepolarizer for dissolution dynamic nuclear polarization. J. Chem. Phys. 128, 241102 (2008).
exp
th t0 Tpara
NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8:14535 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14535 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications 7
ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14535
26. Hvener, J.-B. et al. Quality assurance of PASADENA hyperpolarization for 13C biomolecules. Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. 22, 123134 (2009).
27. Goldman, M., Johannesson, H., Axelsson, O. & Karlsson, M. Design and implementation of C-13 hyperpolarization from para-hydrogen, for new MRI contrast agents. Comptes Rendus Chim. 9, 357363 (2006).
28. Johannesson, H., Axelsson, O. & Karlsson, M. Transfer of para-hydrogen spin order into polarization by diabatic eld cycling. C R Phys. 5, 315324 (2004).
29. Coffey, A. M. et al. Open-source automated parahydrogen hyperpolarizer for molecular imaging using 13C metabolic contrast agents. Anal. Chem. 88, 82798288 (2016).
30. Olsson, L. E. et al. MR coronary angiography in pigs with intraarterial injections of a hyperpolarized 13C substance. Magn. Reson. Med. 55, 731737 (2006).
31. Dutta, P., Martinez, G. V. & Gillies, R. J. A new horizon of DNP technology: application to in-vivo 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys. Rev 5, 271281 (2013).
32. Bar, S. et al. On the spin order transfer from parahydrogen to another nucleus.J. Magn. Reson. 225, 2535 (2012).33. Weiger, M., Pruessmann, K. P. & Hennel, F. MRI with zero echo time: hard versus sweep pulse excitation. Magn. Reson. Med. 66, 379389 (2011).34. Koptyug, I. V. et al. Para-hydrogen-induced polarization in heterogeneous hydrogenation reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 55805586 (2007).
35. Kovtunov, K. V., Beck, I. E., Bukhtiyarov, V. I. & Koptyug, I. V. Observation of parahydrogen-induced polarization in heterogeneous hydrogenationon supported metal catalysts. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 47, 14921495 (2008).
36. Kovtunov, K. V., Zhivonitko, V. V., Corma, A. & Koptyug, I. V. Parahydrogen-induced polarization in heterogeneous hydrogenations catalyzed by an immobilized Au(III) complex. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 1, 17051708 (2010).
37. Glggler, S. et al. A nanoparticle catalyst for heterogeneous phase para-hydrogen-induced polarization in water. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 54, 24522456 (2015).
38. Reineri, F. et al. Use of labile precursors for the generation of hyperpolarized molecules from hydrogenation with parahydrogen and aqueous-phase extraction. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 50, 73507353 (2011).
39. Comment, A. & Van Der Klink, J. Infusion pump with phase separator. US patent 8,034,027 (2011).
40. Chekmenev, E. Y. et al. PASADENA hyperpolarization of succinic acid for MRI and NMR spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 42124213 (2008).
41. Bhattacharya, P. et al. Towards hyperpolarized 13C-succinate imaging of brain cancer. J. Magn. Reson. 186, 150155 (2007).
42. Ross, B. D., Bhattacharya, P., Wagner, S., Tran, T. & Sailasuta, N. Hyperpolarized MR imaging: neurologic applications of hyperpolarized metabolism. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 31, 2433 (2010).
43. Zacharias, N. M., Chan, H. R., Sailasuta, N., Ross, B. D. & Bhattacharya, P. Real-time molecular imaging of tricarboxylic acid cycle metabolism in vivo by hyperpolarized 1-13C diethyl succinate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 934943 (2012).
44. Hoevener, J.-B. et al. A continuous-ow, high-throughput, high-pressure parahydrogen converter for hyperpolarization in a clinical setting. NMR Biomed. 26, 124131 (2013).
45. Haake, M., Natterer, J. & Bargon, J. Efcient NMR pulse sequences to transfer the parahydrogen-induced polarization to hetero nuclei. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 8891 (1996).
46. Goldman, M. & Johannesson, H. Conversion of a proton pair para order into 13C polarization by rf irradiation, for use in MRI. Comptes Rendus Phys. 6, 575581 (2005).
47. Hvener, J.-B., Knecht, S., Schwaderlapp, N., Hennig, J. & von Elverfeldt, D. Continuous re-hyperpolarization of nuclear spins using parahydrogen: theory and experiment. Chem. Phys. Chem. 15, 24512457 (2014).
48. Bottomley, P. A. Spatial localization in NMR spectroscopy in vivo. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 508, 333348 (1987).
49. Hennig, J., Nauerth, A. & Friedburg, H. RARE imaging: a fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magn. Reson. Med. 3, 823833 (1986).
50. Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 671675 (2012).
Acknowledgements
Funding support by the DFG (HO 4604/1-1 and HO 4604/2-1), the German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research, the European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 642773 and the contribution of the COST Action TD1103 is gratefully acknowledged.
Author contributions
A.B.S. and S.B. have contributed equally and have performed the experiments. A.B.S., S.B. and T.L. have implemented the method. J.-B.H., T.L., N.S., C.M., A.D., P.R., S.K. and J.G.S. helped with measurements. A.B.S., T.L. and W.S. designed the reactor. W.S. constructed the reactor. The experiment was devised by J.-B.H. J.H., D.v.E. and J.-B.H. supervised the project and provided the equipment. A.B.S., J.-B.H. and S.B. evaluated and illustrated the results. All authors contributed to the discussion and interpretation of the results. A.B.S. and J.-B.H. wrote the manuscript.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =http://www.nature.com/ http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =naturecommunications
Competing nancial interests: The authors declare no competing nancial interests.
Reprints and permission information is available online at http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/
Web End =http://npg.nature.com/ http://npg.nature.com/reprintsandpermissions/
Web End =reprintsandpermissions/
How to cite this article: Schmidt, A. B. et al. Liquid-state carbon-13 hyperpolarization generated in an MRI system for fast imaging. Nat. Commun. 8, 14535doi: 10.1038/ncomms14535 (2017).
Publishers note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional afliations.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articles Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Web End =http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
r The Author(s) 2017
8 NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8:14535 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14535 | http://www.nature.com/naturecommunications
Web End =www.nature.com/naturecommunications
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Copyright Nature Publishing Group Mar 2017
Abstract
Hyperpolarized (HP) tracers dramatically increase the sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to monitor metabolism non-invasively and in vivo. Their production, however, requires an extra polarizing device (polarizer) whose complexity, operation and cost can exceed that of an MRI system itself. Furthermore, the lifetime of HP tracers is short and some of the enhancement is lost during transfer to the application site. Here, we present the production of HP tracers in water without an external polarizer: by Synthesis Amid the Magnet Bore, A Dramatically Enhanced Nuclear Alignment (SAMBADENA) is achieved within seconds, corresponding to a hyperpolarization of ∼20%. As transfer of the tracer is no longer required, SAMBADENA may permit a higher polarization at the time of detection at a fraction of the cost and complexity of external polarizers. This development is particularly promising in light of the recently extended portfolio of biomedically relevant para-hydrogen-tracers and may lead to new diagnostic applications.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer