Abstract/Details

A tale of three disciplines: Navigating the boundaries at the nexus of conservation science, policy and practice


2009 2009

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

Nature is under immediate and increasing threat. Habitat destruction and species’ extinctions abound despite the myriad interventions and multitude of investments by governments, organizations, and communities. As the extinction crisis looms larger and demands on the public purse grow greater, understanding how science becomes policy and policy practice is more importanqat than ever. In response to this call and to the increasing insularity of conservation biology that has consciously nourished a careful separation of knowledge and action, of scientist and park manager, I explored questions at the nexus of conservation science, policy, and practice. How is science translated into policy? How does policy become practice? I applied cognitive theory and conflict modelling to case studies in forest hydrology and species conservation to deconstruct how conservation science becomes policy. I collected field data from Lake Mead National Recreation Area and from the World Bank to examine how policies are translated into practice.

These are important questions because current assumptions in conservation biology apportions these three separate but equal disciplines – science, policy, and practice – into one that is central and two that are peripheral. But the transmission of knowledge from the Academy to the domains of conservation policy and practice, though difficult, is our mandate. Thus, as much as technical competence matters in conservation biology, so too does political literacy. After all, conservation occurs within a dynamic social, political, and institutional landscape. Nonetheless, the current emphasis in conservation biology continues to focus on answering questions in the natural sciences and, to a lesser degree, in economics. This focus is important, as is protecting scholarship from the daily pressures of a society that demands quick and ready answers. But scientific data is only one commodity among many that policy-makers and conservation practitioners trade in a tournament of values. Its usefulness lies in the wider social and political environment. Moreover, conservation biology is not simply an applied subset of biology or ecology. It is a mission-driven discipline that dedicates itself to the pursuit of science to save wildlife and wild lands. It encapsulates certain values as axioms. We hold these truths to be self-evident: that the diversity of life matters and that the struggle to end extinctions is meaningful.

Therefore, though conservation science, the design of conservation policies, and the practice of conservation are separate disciplines, they are each integral to the other in our mission to best affect conservation outcomes. We must understand their different rules of evidence, speak their distinctive languages, and achieve credibility in all three disciplines while maintaining a sense of intellectual integrity in each. This dissertation navigates the nexus of all three disciplines by respecting their differences as well as recognizing their shared mission in the service of wildlife and wild lands.

Indexing (details)


Subject
Conservation;
Environmental management;
Political science;
Environmental science
Classification
0408: Conservation
0474: Environmental management
0615: Political science
0768: Environmental science
Identifier / keyword
Health and environmental sciences; Social sciences; Biological sciences; Conservation; Endangered Species Act; Environmental policy; Invasive species; Lake Mead National Recreation Area; Quagga mussels
Title
A tale of three disciplines: Navigating the boundaries at the nexus of conservation science, policy and practice
Author
Hickey, Valerie Mary
Number of pages
175
Publication year
2009
Degree date
2009
School code
0066
Source
DAI-B 71/05, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
ISBN
9781109733136
Advisor
Pimm, Stuart L.
Committee member
Christensen, Norman L.; Mayer, Frederick W.; Salzman, James E.
University/institution
Duke University
Department
Environment
University location
United States -- North Carolina
Degree
Ph.D.
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Language
English
Document type
Dissertation/Thesis
Dissertation/thesis number
3398918
ProQuest document ID
275999232
Copyright
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
http://search.proquest.com/docview/275999232
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.