Abstract/Details

A COMPARISON OF TWO COUNTRY RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACHES


1982 1982

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

This study was undertaken with the purpose of advancing the field of "country risk" assessment and assisting United States commercial banks in their selection of the appropriate approach to use in such assessments. To accomplish this objective the writer compared two approaches--the "structured qualitative" and the "market-oriented."

The writer tested the basic hypothesis that if countries are ranked by each of the approaches, the rankings resulting from one approach will not be strongly positively correlated with those resulting from the other approach. One-year assessment horizons were used. The writer chose two models--one to represent each of the approaches studied. A set of twenty countries that were the major borrowers on the Euromarket between 1975 and 1979 were ranked by each method.

There was no indication of strong positive correlation in any of the cases studied. This led to the conclusion that given the lack of solid theoretical foundation for the qualitative method combined with little empirical evidence for its validity, the method should be rejected. The market-oriented approach does have roots in financial theory, and it should be the method that banks employ.

The writer points out that further research in the field is needed in order to accelerate the rate of progress to meet the growing needs for rapidly improving country risk assessments.

Indexing (details)


Subject
Banking
Classification
0770: Banking
Identifier / keyword
Social sciences
Title
A COMPARISON OF TWO COUNTRY RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACHES
Author
MANKIN, ROBERT STEPHEN
Number of pages
376
Publication year
1982
Degree date
1982
School code
0483
Source
DAI-A 43/04, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
University/institution
Pace University
University location
United States -- New York
Degree
D.P.S.
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Language
English
Document type
Dissertation/Thesis
Dissertation/thesis number
8220645
ProQuest document ID
303093529
Copyright
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
http://search.proquest.com/docview/303093529
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.