Abstract/Details

Privatism in urban form: A case study on the morphological transformation of Society Hill and Olde City in Philadelphia since the early sixties


1990 1990

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

This essay is concerned with a study of urban form in terms of its cultural content, privatism. It aims to give an interpretation of the syndrome of privatization that is "expressed" in select urban forms in America, and in particular, in the forms of Society Hill and Olde City in Philadelphia.

The legitimacy of urban physical intervention has been based on a populist ethos--the urban-form-as-public-asset view of contemporary cities. This idea holds that an insider-territorial holder's property right "can or must" be transferred to the governance of outsiders if an intervention would cater to the collective welfare of a region where the intervention takes place. In private cities where privatism is the dominant urban culture, urban property relations are instituted as commodity relations, thus, urban forms are treated as private goods. These two movements are, by nature, likely to contradict each other. This essay hopes to postulate an idea that, paradoxically, both tend to affiliate, not to contradict, due to the imperatives of privatist urban culture. This affiliation has often resulted in walled divisions of urban space and people, that is, urban enclaves.

Three principal approaches have been the basis for this inquiry: they include cultural research, general morphological research, and focused morphological research. As a cultural research, chapter two discusses the various symptoms of privatization that are reflected on urban cultural spheres. As a general morphological research, chapter three interprets the ways in which this cultural content has been expressed in the morphological attributes of typical street-blocks in American cities. Finally, as a focused morphological research, chapters four and five are devoted to an empirical observation and explanation of the privatization tendencies which are reflected in the forms of the study areas, on the basis of the conceptual frames of reference, i.e., the depth of public claims and private claims.

This essay is an exercise of what I have identified in chapter one as the syndrome view of urban morphology, whose eventual goal is to suggest critical accounts of the role and meaning of the urban form-giving disciplinarism that are practiced today in many private cities.

Indexing (details)


Subject
Architecture;
Geography;
Urban planning;
Area planning & development
Classification
0729: Architecture
0366: Geography
0999: Urban planning
0999: Area planning & development
Identifier / keyword
Communication and the arts, Social sciences, Pennsylvania
Title
Privatism in urban form: A case study on the morphological transformation of Society Hill and Olde City in Philadelphia since the early sixties
Author
Shin, Ki-Cheol
Number of pages
320
Publication year
1990
Degree date
1990
School code
0175
Source
DAI-A 51/05, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
Advisor
McCleary, Peter
University/institution
University of Pennsylvania
University location
United States -- Pennsylvania
Degree
Ph.D.
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Language
English
Document type
Dissertation/Thesis
Dissertation/thesis number
9026644
ProQuest document ID
303827979
Copyright
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
http://search.proquest.com/docview/303827979
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.