The organization of urban common-property institutions: The case of apartment communities in Seoul

1992 1992

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

Traditional property arrangements in urban residential settings dichotomize property into private and public domains. This dissertation examines a new type of urban property, organized to maintain an urban commons, composed partly of property that is traditionally private and partly of property that is traditionally public. In the U.S., this type of property includes both condominiums and homeowners' associations, often considered together as "residential community associations" (RCAs). Apartment communities as organized in Seoul, Korea, are RCAs that include both individually-owned apartment units as private property and the apartment buildings and grounds that are commonly owned by apartment owners. Moreover, the grounds are extensive and may include infrastructure normally held as public property, such as streets and sidewalks, in addition to parks, playgrounds, gardens, and parking lots.

The main focus of this study is on the way in which apartment communities in Seoul address the characteristic collective-action problems related to organizing a commons, such as pastures, groundwater supplies, or irrigation works. Six apartment communities were selected from the same district of Seoul, evenly grouped by particular physical and institutional variables, and studied in depth.

The collective-action problems that arise in apartment communities are those typical of common-property institutions: access control, use regulation, and maintenance. Each problem is related to a different physical attribute of the apartment commons. Apartment communities not only formulate and enforce operational rules, but also raise revenue through mandatory fees and are largely self-governing.

The apartment commons, although used also by outsiders, is commonly owned by apartment owners and primarily used and cared for by apartment dwellers within the community boundaries. All six communities studied possess the necessary characteristics to be considered effective common-property institutions. They successfully cope with the collective-action problems characteristic of the commons, organizing and maintaining the apartment commons as common-property.

Indexing (details)

Public administration;
Political science;
Urban planning;
Area planning & development
0617: Public administration
0615: Political science
0999: Urban planning
0999: Area planning & development
Identifier / keyword
Social sciences; urban community
The organization of urban common-property institutions: The case of apartment communities in Seoul
Choe, Jaesong
Number of pages
Publication year
Degree date
School code
DAI-A 53/12, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
Oakerson, Ronald
Indiana University
University location
United States -- Indiana
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Document type
Dissertation/thesis number
ProQuest document ID
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.