Abstract/Details

How is performance on the selection task affected by pragmatic reasoning schemas?


1992 1992

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

Six experiments investigated Cheng and Holyoak's (1985) pragmatic reasoning schema theory and factors that increase subjects' rates of correct performance on variations of Wason's (1966) selection task. Cheng and Holyoak's content-based theory accounts for a wellknown effect associated with the selection task in which specific changes in its content increase subjects' rates of correct performance. Generally, they claim that reasoning is guided by pragmatic reasoning schemas, clusters of inferences that are abstracted from repeated exposures to particular situations. Their strongest piece of evidence comes from a selection task variation on which subjects' performance is attributed to content that purportedly elicits a pragmatic schema and leads to superior performance when compared to a control problem with descriptive content. However, their experiment contains several confounds. Cheng and Holyoak's problems differ from one another with respect to the kind and amount of information provided. For example, their experimental problem consistently employs negatives and requires subjects to role-play an authority figure, whereas their control problem does neither of these. Moreover, both of their problems employ a task requirement that is different than Wason's. The confounds were neutralized and six hundred subjects were run to investigate pragmatic schemas' role in facilitating rates of correct performance on selection task problems. Though Cheng and Holyoak's original finding was confirmed in Experiment 1, it appears that facilitation relies on the unique task requirement adopted by Cheng and Holyoak's paradigm. Experiment 2 demonstrated that when the problems remove the accessory information found in Cheng and Holyoak's pragmatic problem, and thus more closely follow the presentation of Wason's original problem, subjects' performance is poor. Experiments 3 through 5 honed in on a different factor that is responsible for the observed facilitation on a pragmatic problem--the manner in which negatives are employed. Experiment 6 indicated that descriptive problems are not affected by the same kinds of manipulations that facilitate correct performance on pragmatic problems. The results from these experiments raise doubts about Cheng and Holyoak's claim that reasoning is typically mediated by pragmatic reasoning schemas.

Indexing (details)


Subject
Psychology;
Experiments
Classification
0623: Psychology
0623: Experiments
Identifier / keyword
Psychology; problem-solving
Title
How is performance on the selection task affected by pragmatic reasoning schemas?
Author
Noveck, Ira Andrew
Number of pages
71
Publication year
1992
Degree date
1992
School code
0146
Source
DAI-B 53/11, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
Advisor
Braine, Martin D. S.
University/institution
New York University
University location
United States -- New York
Degree
Ph.D.
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Language
English
Document type
Dissertation/Thesis
Dissertation/thesis number
9306796
ProQuest document ID
304032490
Copyright
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
http://search.proquest.com/docview/304032490
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.