Abstract/Details

Automaticity and written language: An investigation of the written language performance of second- and fourth-grade students with and without learning disabilities


1994 1994

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

The written language performance of learning disabled students has been found to be quantitatively and qualitatively inferior of that of their nondisabled peers. Most research has been directed at describing the deficiencies in the written language compositions of students with learning disabilities, rather than investigating possible underlying cognitive processes as has been done in the reading and mathematics domains. Although some researchers have proposed that lower level skills such as handwriting, spelling, and sentence generation must be developed to an automatic level in order for higher level processes, such as theme development and text cohesion, to occur, these theories have not been empirically tested. This study was designed to investigate the relationship between fast, accurate execution of lower level skills ("automaticity") with the production of an integrated writing task (story composition).

Two hundred seventeen learning disabled and nondisabled students in second and fourth grade classrooms in Connecticut served as subjects for the study. Subjects completed five tasks that involved automaticity: letter identification, word recognition, writing the alphabet, word fluency, and sentence fluency. Subjects also produced a narrative story composition that was rated for fluency, vocabulary, theme elements, spelling, and cohesion. An overall story quality score was also computed, and two standardized tests of reading and spelling skills were administered to provide measures of achievement.

Results of the MANCOVA and planned Stepdown Analyses indicated differences between grade level groups and disability groups, even after initial adjustment for differences in reading and spelling achievement. Fourth grade subjects were superior to second grade subjects; and nondisabled subjects were superior to learning disabled subjects on several of the measures of automaticity and story composition variables. Automatic word recognition and spelling were particularly sensitive to differences between groups.

Discriminant Function Analysis indicated that group membership was reliably predicted using four of the five automaticity variables and five of the story composition variables. Correlation matrices indicated strong relationships between automaticity and overall quality of the story for all groups. Findings from this study suggest that the poor quality of LD students' written language may be related to underlying difficulties with lower level skills.

Indexing (details)


Subject
Special education;
Elementary education
Classification
0529: Special education
0524: Elementary education
Identifier / keyword
Education, second-grade
Title
Automaticity and written language: An investigation of the written language performance of second- and fourth-grade students with and without learning disabilities
Author
Sharp, Susan LeClair
Number of pages
158
Publication year
1994
Degree date
1994
School code
0056
Source
DAI-A 56/04, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
University/institution
University of Connecticut
University location
United States -- Connecticut
Degree
Ph.D.
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Language
English
Document type
Dissertation/Thesis
Dissertation/thesis number
9525684
ProQuest document ID
304144392
Copyright
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
http://search.proquest.com/docview/304144392
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.