Abstract/Details

The relationship between affect and recognition memory for reproductions of paintings


1995 1995

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

Seven experiments were performed with complex visual stimuli (color reproductions of paintings). Subjects were tested with Yes/No recognition memory. In Experiment 1, a levels of processing manipulation yielded better recognition performance for single color and monochrome pictures encoded with a liking question than with a color-of-stimulus question. In Experiment 2, subjects studied a new set of single color pictures restricted to Landscapes, Portraits and Still Lifes. Recognition conditionalized on liking (using a five-point scale) revealed a modest "Pollyanna" effect: liked items were best recognized.

In order to manipulate affect, experimenter controlled paired stimuli were created from Experiment 2 pictures by factorially combining Categorical, conceptual relatedness (Related: Portrait/Portrait, and Unrelated: Landscape/Still Life) and Aesthetic, stylistic relatedness (Related and Unrelated: established by ratings). Subject ratings established that among the four Pair Types, Categorically and Aesthetically Related pairs were highest rated on all types of relatedness, followed by Categorically Related, Aesthetically Unrelated pairs and Categorically Unrelated, Aesthetically Related pairs; and last, Categorically and Aesthetically Unrelated pairs. In Experiments 3-6, the paired stimuli were incidentally or intentionally encoded, sometimes with aesthetic relatedness encoding tasks.

Results across experiments revealed that Categorically Related pairs yield better mean recognition performance, but Aesthetically Related pairs are preferred, even when lacking categorical relatedness. Categorically and Aesthetically Related pairs were consistently best recognized and most liked. Portraits as a group were sometimes better recognized, but this effect was not the source of significant main effects. In Experiment 3, a Pollyanna effect was found for pairs, and in Experiment 6, a context change manipulation produced diminished performance for changed context items, in particular for Aesthetically Related pairs, suggesting that aesthetic affect may function somewhat like mood.

For single picture stimuli, the impact of affect on memory seems direct and preference-based, although it is unclear if subjects experience aesthetic affect. Paired picture stimuli make complex affective and information processing demands, and better recognition for them may be predominantly a function of facilitation of encoding when pairwise information is semantically and visually redundant.

Indexing (details)


Subject
Psychology;
Experiments;
Art education
Classification
0623: Psychology
0623: Experiments
0273: Art education
Identifier / keyword
Education; Psychology; visual memory
Title
The relationship between affect and recognition memory for reproductions of paintings
Author
Mindes, Janet
Number of pages
293
Publication year
1995
Degree date
1995
School code
0146
Source
DAI-B 56/11, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
Advisor
Snodgrass, Joan Gay
University/institution
New York University
University location
United States -- New York
Degree
Ph.D.
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Language
English
Document type
Dissertation/Thesis
Dissertation/thesis number
9609227
ProQuest document ID
304210325
Copyright
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
http://search.proquest.com/docview/304210325
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.