Abstract/Details

Evaluating parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) for biological control of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on poinsettia


1997 1997

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

Three aphelinid parasitoids were evaluated for the biological control of silverleaf whitefly, Bemisia argentifolii Bellows and Perring (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd. ex Klotzsch) in replicated experimental greenhouses at Cornell University, Ithaca NY. Life-tables for B. argentifolii in the presence and absence of parasitoids were constructed from bi-weekly photographs of whitefly nymphs on poinsettia leaves. Concurrent with photography, weekly population counts of whitefly lifestages on poinsettia plants were made in experimental greenhouses.

A release rate of one Encarsia formosa Beltsville strain/plant/week produced 23% parasitism and 96% mortality of photographed nymphs. Releasing three E. formosa Beltsville strain/plant/week caused parasitism to decrease to 12% and whitefly mortality to increase to 99%. Releasing one Eretmocerus sp. nr. californicus (AZ)/plant/week produced 34% parasitism and 88% whitefly mortality. Releasing three E. sp. nr. californicus (AZ)/plant/week caused observed parasitism to decline to 10% and overall mortality of photographed nymphs to increase to 99.1%.

The efficacy of these two parasitoids was compared to the commercially available strain of Encarsia formosa Gahan. The commercial strain of E. formosa achieved 23% parasitism and 92% whitefly mortality at a release rate of three females/plant/week. Releasing one female E. formosa/plant/week caused 13% parasitism and 95% whitefly mortality. In a commercial greenhouse, an average weekly release rate of six E. formosa/plant/week resulted in 39% parasitism and 86% mortality. Increasing levels of parasitism and decreasing mortality levels as release rates of commercial E. formosa increase may be due to mutual interference between searching females. Whitefly mortality on greenhouse grown poinsettia in the absence of parasitoids at Cornell University was 19%-25%. To suppress B. argentifolii population growth with inundative parasitoid releases, whitefly net reproductive rates $\rm(R\sb{o})$ have to be less than one. This was achieved when mortality of photographed nymphs exceeded 96%.

Discovery and utilization of whitefly nymphs on single leaf poinsettia plants placed within the canopies of commercially grown poinsettia crops indicated that E. sp. nr. californicus (AZ) had a Type I functional response, while E. formosa Beltsville strain exhibited a Type II functional response. E. sp. nr. californicus (AZ) located a greater number of whitefly patches more quickly, and caused higher levels of whitefly mortality than E. formosa Beltsville strain. The observed results may have been affected by the density of whitefly nymphs on non-experimental plants and crop canopy size which differed between greenhouses; both of which were greater in E. formosa Beltsville strain greenhouses.

Indexing (details)


Subject
Entomology;
Ecology
Classification
0353: Entomology
0329: Ecology
Identifier / keyword
Biological sciences; Encarsia formosa; Eretmocerus; Euphorbia pulcherrima; silverleaf whitefly
Title
Evaluating parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae) for biological control of Bemisia argentifolii (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) on poinsettia
Author
Hoddle, Mark Stephen
Number of pages
164
Publication year
1997
Degree date
1997
School code
0118
Source
DAI-B 58/02, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
ISBN
0591301547, 9780591301540
Advisor
Driesche, Roy G. Van
University/institution
University of Massachusetts Amherst
University location
United States -- Massachusetts
Degree
Ph.D.
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Language
English
Document type
Dissertation/Thesis
Dissertation/thesis number
9721458
ProQuest document ID
304357008
Copyright
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
http://search.proquest.com/docview/304357008
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.