Evaluation and statistical analysis of groundwater monitoring data for waste disposal facilities

1997 1997

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

Many waste disposal facilities are subject to ground water monitoring to detect contamination. Statistical comparisons are used to determine if concentrations of chemical parameters in down-gradient wells are significantly elevated when compared to up-gradient wells. Statistical techniques for such comparisons are described in federal regulations and USEPA guidance documents. However, difficulties may occur in applying these methods to actual ground water monitoring situations. A combination of actual ground water monitoring data and artificial data sets are used to improve techniques to evaluate the presence of ground water contamination. The actual ground water monitoring data is from over 30 regulated hazardous waste disposal facilities and includes over 180,000 individual concentration measurements. Artificial data sets were created representing a variety of actual ground water monitoring situations. Characteristics of actual ground water monitoring data are evaluated for artifacts and metals contamination. Artifact contamination is usually present at concentrations below 50 parts-per-billion. Artifacts are commonly detected in multiple wells for a sampling event. The relationship between total and dissolved concentrations varied for each metal. Only for iron, was a relationship of the total metal concentration to turbidity apparent. A statistical analysis showed that for five of sixteen comparisons, there was no difference in the number of wells showing contamination for total and dissolved metals. For nine of sixteen comparisons, total metals resulted in more wells showing contamination than dissolved metals. In two cases, the number of contaminated wells was greater for dissolved metals than for total metals. In an evaluation of statistical methods where a high percentage of samples showed undetectable concentrations of the test chemical, the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon rank methods are shown to be the preferred over non-parametric and Poisson limit methods. Using artificial data sets, Shewhart-CUSUM control charts are shown to be poorly suited to ground water monitoring data. Analysis of variance methods are shown to be better suited when only the six most recent sampling events are included in the analysis. Many of these research findings are directly applicable to current practice for ground water monitoring and the evaluation of environmental contamination.

Indexing (details)

Environmental science
0372: Geology
0768: Environmental science
Identifier / keyword
Health and environmental sciences; Earth sciences; water monitoring
Evaluation and statistical analysis of groundwater monitoring data for waste disposal facilities
Pittenger, Robert Allan
Number of pages
Publication year
Degree date
School code
DAI-B 58/12, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
9780591705751, 0591705753
West, Terry R.
Purdue University
University location
United States -- Indiana
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Document type
Dissertation/thesis number
ProQuest document ID
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.