Debating the paradigms of justice: The bivalence of environmental justice

1999 1999

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

Environmental justice addresses social justice related to human activities that affect both human and natural environments, including the impact of human activities upon human health and values, immediate living and working conditions, natural resources that humans depend upon, cultural values intimately tied with the natural environment, and the ways in which the institution of environmentalism affects human relations. This description reveals that social problems are intimately connected with environmental problems. The causal connection between social problems and environmental problems may point in either direction: the social problem may be the cause of the environmental problem or vice versa.

Recent justice theory is spliced by several general perspectives such as distributive theories, theories of political recognition, identity politics, and non-western alternatives. I consider these various perspectives with a particular emphasis on the ways in which environmental justice affects the debate between distributive justice and justice in the politics of recognition. Distributive justice theories focus on the fair distribution and redistribution of material goods in a society. On this account, the cultural characteristics of the society are ultimately explained by virtue of material distribution. Justice in the politics of recognition emerges from principles of self-determination, cultural identity, and political recognition. According to this viewpoint, cultural institutions and habits determine the conditions for social status which then guide the distribution of material goods. Contemporary justice theory seems gridlocked into this dichotomy.

As a means to analyze this dichotomy, I draw upon the work of Nancy Fraser, who uses four key contrasts to distinguish the fundamental conflict between the two paradigms. Fraser identifies the conflict as the redistribution-recognition problem: a problem that must be addressed if we wish to achieve progress in social justice. I argue that environmental justice is plagued by the same redistribution-recognition problem.

Using a bivalent conception of participatory parity as the bridging criterion for a theory of justice, which requires the operation of both paradigms simultaneously, I discuss the merits of Fraser's approach in the context of environmental justice. The dissertation concludes with a bivalent solution for environmental justice, which I argue has not heretofore been fully established.

Indexing (details)

Environmental science
0422: Philosophy
0768: Environmental science
Identifier / keyword
Philosophy, religion and theology; Health and environmental sciences; Environmental justice; Equity; Justice; Politics; Racism
Debating the paradigms of justice: The bivalence of environmental justice
Figueroa, Robert Melchior
Number of pages
Publication year
Degree date
School code
DAI-A 60/07, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
9780599400597, 0599400595
Mills, Claudia
University of Colorado at Boulder
University location
United States -- Colorado
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Document type
Dissertation/thesis number
ProQuest document ID
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.