Fact or fiction? Gender issues related to newspaper reports of intimate partner homicide

2007 2007

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

Society looks to the news media to provide an accurate portrayal of social issues, particularly crime (Curran, Gurevitch, & Woollacott, 1979). However, the media needs to report marketable stories, and thus sensational crimes often saturate the headlines (Chibnall, 1977; Sheley & Ashkins, 1981). The worthiness of the victim plays a crucial role in which stories are reported. As a result, the public may receive information only about sensational cases or cases in which the victim is considered newsworthy by reporters and/or editors (Sorenson, Manz, & Berk, 1998).

Media portrayal of intimate partner (IPV) homicides can also vary considerably. When IPV murders are reported, broader social issues of violence between intimates is often ignored (Taylor & Sorenson, 2002). In addition, IPV homicide has been shown to be reported differently based on the gender of the perpetrator or victim. For instance, when the perpetrator is male, explanations for his actions are often given (Carll, 1999) and it can appear that the female victim is blamed for the events that occurred.

By analyzing 30 articles reporting female perpetrated IPV homicides and 70 articles reporting male perpetrated IPV homicides, the current study discovered that the broader contextual issue of domestic violence was not mentioned in 99% of the articles. On the other hand, results showed that when contextual factors were included, they helped to describe the rarity of female perpetrated IPV homicide. Additionally, results revealed no significant gender differences for either article length or number of follow-up reports, representing a failure to support the hypothesis that female perpetrated IPV would be portrayed as more newsworthy and receive more coverage due to relative rarity. When analyzing explanations for homicides that appeared in the articles, as well as descriptors used to portray the perpetrator, there was no support found for gender bias in favor of male perpetrators. Contrary to previous findings, female victims were more likely to be portrayed as innocent (92.9%) than were male victims (40%). Instead, female victims were not seen as the cause of the perpetrators actions, while male victims were more likely to be depicted in this manner.

Indexing (details)

Womens studies;
Mass media
0391: Journalism
0453: Womens studies
0627: Criminology
0630: Welfare
0708: Mass media
Identifier / keyword
Communication and the arts; Social sciences; Gender issues; Homicide; Intimate partner homicide; Newspaper
Fact or fiction? Gender issues related to newspaper reports of intimate partner homicide
Wozniak, Jessica
Number of pages
Publication year
Degree date
School code
DAI-A 68/06, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
McCloskey, Kathy A.
University of Hartford
University location
United States -- Connecticut
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Document type
Dissertation/thesis number
ProQuest document ID
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.