Abstract/Details

A comparison of two alternative models of economic impact: A case study of the Mississippi Nissan plant


2007 2007

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

This dissertation uses two methods to estimate the regional employment impact of a large production plant: input-output analysis and a relative employment density model. Input-output analysis projects the total number of jobs created, both direct and auxiliary, by an economic event. The problem with this method is that it does not account for possible job displacement. A job is displaced when a worker fills a new position and the vacated job remains vacant or is eliminated entirely. Thus, input-output analysis overstates the regional employment impact of a new production facility. In contrast, the relative employment density model estimates net employment and explicitly takes job displacement into account.

As an illustrative case study, this dissertation analyzes the regional employment impact of Nissan North America, Inc.'s automobile production facility in Canton, Mississippi, built in 2001. The State of Mississippi spent $425 million, plus incentives, to entice Nissan to locate in Canton. This public expenditure was based on the expectation that the plant would create as many as 30,000 jobs in Mississippi.

The results of the relative employment density model show that input-output analysis overstates the employment impact by thousands of jobs. The density model provides lower and more accurate employment estimates because it takes displaced jobs into account. The empirical results also show that a region that invests in human and physical capital encourages firms to increase employment in the region. The conclusion of this dissertation is that government policymakers should incorporate these two factors into their economic development plans.

Indexing (details)


Subject
Management;
Economics;
Studies;
Economic impact;
Automobile industry
Classification
0454: Management
0505: Economics
Identifier / keyword
Social sciences; Economic development; Economic event; Economic impact; Employment density; Input-output study; Job displacement; Mississippi; Nissan Motors
Title
A comparison of two alternative models of economic impact: A case study of the Mississippi Nissan plant
Author
Peavy, John Patrick
Number of pages
98
Publication year
2007
Degree date
2007
School code
0131
Source
DAI-A 70/05, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
ISBN
9781109177398
Advisor
Chappell, William F.
University/institution
The University of Mississippi
University location
United States -- Mississippi
Degree
Ph.D.
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Language
English
Document type
Dissertation/Thesis
Dissertation/thesis number
3358534
ProQuest document ID
304837643
Copyright
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
http://search.proquest.com/docview/304837643/abstract
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.