Attention and eye movement control: Interaction of top -down and bottom -up information

2007 2007

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

Many studies show that bottom-up and top-down information interactively control attentional deployment. This study explores how these two factors are integrated when controlling attention and eye movements. In this study, attention was affected by top-down factors (informative location cues, strategies) and by a bottom-up factor (an orientation singleton), with the intensity of each manipulated systematically. Results of Experiment 1 showed that one top-down factor (previous knowledge about the target location) can control attention independently from the bottom-up factor. This result raises some difficulties for those models that predict competition between top-down and bottom-up factors to control attention. The study implies separation between the pathways for top-down attention control and bottom-up attention control. This pattern is consistent with recent neuroscience findings, which show that different brain regions are involved in top-down and bottom-up attention control.

Strategies were manipulated between Experiment 1 and Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, participants were encouraged to employ a singleton detection mode; in Experiment 2, participants could not employ a singleton detection mode. Results showed that the singleton could capture attention in Experiment 1; however, only the most salient singletons could capture attention in Experiment 2. This result is only partially consistent with the idea that a singleton could capture attention only when participants employ a singleton detection mode. Singletons with some specific properties could apparently capture attention even when participants could not employ singleton detection mode.

Experiment 3 showed that eye movements are also controlled by the interaction of the top-down factors and the bottom-up factors. First saccades went to the singleton location more often if participants employed singleton detection mode than if they used a different strategy. First saccades also went to the singleton location more often when the informativeness of the cue decreased, and when the orientation of the singleton increased. Eye movement control differed from covert attention control in that it showed competition between top-down and bottom-up factors. This difference in overt and covert attentional control probably arises because covert attention can be simultaneously split across multiple locations, while the eyes can only be directed to a single location at any one time.

Indexing (details)

Cognitive therapy;
Eye movements;
Cognition & reasoning
0633: Cognitive therapy
Identifier / keyword
Psychology; Attention; Bottom-up; Eye movement; Top-down
Attention and eye movement control: Interaction of top -down and bottom -up information
Li, Xingshan
Number of pages
Publication year
Degree date
School code
DAI-B 68/11, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
Cave, Kyle; Rayner, Keith
Committee member
Berthier, Neil E.; Fisher, Donald
University of Massachusetts Amherst
University location
United States -- Massachusetts
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Document type
Dissertation/thesis number
ProQuest document ID
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.