Abstract/Details

Not even past: Race and commemoration in a southern city


2007 2007

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

This work focuses on four racially-charged controversies over commemoration in Richmond, Virginia: battles over a statue of Arthur Ashe, a 30-foot banner of Robert E. Lee, and two holidays: Lee-Jackson-King Day and Confederate History Month. I argue that the cultural forms that comprise commemoration can either exacerbate or reconcile existing racial divisions. It is not just the content of the past, but also the techniques through which it is represented in the present, that explain the success or failure of commemorative activity.

After tracing the evolution of causal narratives about the Civil War, I analyze how political elites use historical narratives to shape collective identity, using Confederate History Month as an example. Addressed to specific audiences, official commemorative proclamations create boundaries and function to include and exclude groups from the larger collectivity.

I next explore the concept of failed commemoration. While the literature on collective memory generally avoids labeling commemorations as failures, preferring labels such as “multivocal” or “fragmented,” sometimes memorials divide rather than unite, silence audiences instead of creating dialogue, and eventually vanish from the commemorative landscape. I create an understanding of what makes memorials “work” (genre, narrative, grammar and form) and then use this conceptualization to specify conditions under which failure is probable. For example, although at times combatants in Richmond categorized their objections to memorials as resting on aesthetic grounds rather than racial divisions, they nonetheless relied on established and racially exclusive conceptions of art to frame their arguments.

The struggle to integrate the commemorative pantheon is also linked to the concurrent struggle for inclusion in the economic and political life of the community; commemoration is inextricably tied to business development, money, opportunity and tourism.

While commemoration is supposed to create and/or reflect a collectivity (or at the minimum, give the illusion of one), it can reveal and intensify existing tensions. The struggle to maintain the commemorative status quo, on one side, and to revise it, on the other, is therefore not just a struggle over powerless symbols—it is a conflict about the racialized ideological, political, and economic structure on which modern commemoration sometimes founders.

Indexing (details)


Subject
Sociology
Classification
0626: Sociology
Identifier / keyword
Social sciences; Collective memory; Commemoration; Race; Richmond; Southern studies; Virginia
Title
Not even past: Race and commemoration in a southern city
Author
Walker, Katherine D.
Number of pages
265
Publication year
2007
Degree date
2007
School code
0118
Source
DAI-A 68/07, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
ISBN
9780549175681
Advisor
Zussman, Robert
University/institution
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Department
Sociology
University location
United States -- Massachusetts
Degree
Ph.D.
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Language
English
Document type
Dissertation/Thesis
Dissertation/thesis number
3275809
ProQuest document ID
304849902
Copyright
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
http://search.proquest.com/docview/304849902
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.