Abstract/Details

A social account of integrity


2005 2005

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

In everyday usage, integrity connotes a sense of being true to oneself, and this connotation is certainly taken up in the philosophical literature. Identity-based approaches to integrity, as developed by Bernard Williams, Gabriele Taylor and Lynn McFall, frame integrity in terms of self-preservation. These accounts have faced considerable criticism, however, from those who doubt the moral worth of self-preservation, which, in some circumstances, can seem self-indulgent, stubbornly implacable or even immoral. This criticism creates a challenge: to retain the sense that integrity is a matter of remaining true to oneself, but at the same time to explain why integrity is morally admirable.

My dissertation meets this challenge by developing a social account of integrity. I argue that because identities are social being true to oneself amounts to more than self-preservation alone; it also involves reliably living up to the legitimate expectations others form given the particular shape of a person's identity.

Living up to the moral responsibilities internal to identities fairly and credibly ascribed to a person is morally admirable, I further argue, because it fosters conditions in which we can trust others to be who they say they will be. Trust in others is an inescapable feature of the lives we lead, and when persons have integrity, those around them are less vulnerable to betrayals of their trust.

Integrity is highly contingent on the socially shared understandings of the responsibilities entailed by a person's identity and sometimes, I argue, integrity will require a person to repudiate an identity whose norms are unjust. As a practical matter, however, her ability to successfully contest the socially authoritative meanings of her identity is going to be vulnerable to the actions and attitudes of others.

The difficulty an individual faces when contesting unjust norms, as well as the threat this poses to her integrity, points, I conclude, to a collective responsibility to ensure that socially dominant norms are not unjust---on the grounds that the moral authority that accrues to persons who are regarded as having integrity should never be contingent on a person having to be reliable with respect to unjust expectations.

Indexing (details)


Subject
Philosophy
Classification
0422: Philosophy
Identifier / keyword
Philosophy, religion and theology; Identity; Integrity; Justice; Oppression; Virtue
Title
A social account of integrity
Author
Strauss, Michelle E. B.
Number of pages
138
Publication year
2005
Degree date
2005
School code
0076
Source
DAI-A 67/01, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
ISBN
9780542501005, 0542501007
Advisor
Little, Margaret O.
University/institution
Georgetown University
University location
United States -- District of Columbia
Degree
Ph.D.
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Language
English
Document type
Dissertation/Thesis
Dissertation/thesis number
3202207
ProQuest document ID
304999575
Copyright
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
http://search.proquest.com/docview/304999575/abstract
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.