Omaha business support for work -based learning

2004 2004

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

The purpose of this study was to examine the demographics of Omaha area employers that participate in and do not participate in work-based learning, to determine the reasons why Omaha area businesses participate in work-based learning and to identify the reasons why or why not companies participate in work-based learning.

Two thousand small, medium and large manufacturing and non-manufacturing metro Omaha companies were mailed surveys in reference to their perceptions of work-based learning. Seven hundred ninety-three companies returned surveys for a 39.7% overall return rate. The data were analyzed using SPSS. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests for independence and independent t-tests were used to analyze the data.

The results indicated that there is no prototypical business that participates in work-based learning in the Omaha area and that participation in work-based learning is not influenced by either size or type of company, manufacturing or non-manufacturing. The closest profile to an organization that would likely participate in work-based learning is a small, less than 50 employees, non-manufacturing company.

External motivators that impacted participation in work-based learning included contributing to the community, good public relations and a long-term recruiting tool. Internal motivators that impacted participation in work-based learning included support by a company's senior management, department management, and company employees and company image.

The results indicate that both participating and non-participating companies have concerns about participating in work-based learning programs and activities. There were differences in the concerns that work-based learning participants had when compared to the concerns of non-participant companies. Both participant and non-participant companies expressed that work-based learning structural issues were their greatest concerns. These structural concerns included union opposition, employee resistance, economic climate, OSHA/labor laws and coordination problems. Concerns regarding students and their actual participation in work-based learning programs were secondary to the structural issues for both participating and non-participating companies. These secondary concerns included students' leaving the program, student immaturity, student availability and students' lacking skills. These concerns were more pronounced in the participating companies than the non-participating companies.

Indexing (details)

Vocational education;
School administration;
Business education
0747: Vocational education
0514: School administration
0688: Business education
Identifier / keyword
Education; Business support; Nebraska; Omaha; Work-based learning
Omaha business support for work -based learning
Bigsby, Keith E.
Number of pages
Publication year
Degree date
School code
DAI-A 66/05, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
9780542148347, 054214834X
McKay, Jack; Schulte, Laura
University of Nebraska at Omaha
University location
United States -- Nebraska
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Document type
Dissertation/thesis number
ProQuest document ID
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.