Abstract/Details

Omaha business support for work -based learning


2004 2004

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

The purpose of this study was to examine the demographics of Omaha area employers that participate in and do not participate in work-based learning, to determine the reasons why Omaha area businesses participate in work-based learning and to identify the reasons why or why not companies participate in work-based learning.

Two thousand small, medium and large manufacturing and non-manufacturing metro Omaha companies were mailed surveys in reference to their perceptions of work-based learning. Seven hundred ninety-three companies returned surveys for a 39.7% overall return rate. The data were analyzed using SPSS. Descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests for independence and independent t-tests were used to analyze the data.

The results indicated that there is no prototypical business that participates in work-based learning in the Omaha area and that participation in work-based learning is not influenced by either size or type of company, manufacturing or non-manufacturing. The closest profile to an organization that would likely participate in work-based learning is a small, less than 50 employees, non-manufacturing company.

External motivators that impacted participation in work-based learning included contributing to the community, good public relations and a long-term recruiting tool. Internal motivators that impacted participation in work-based learning included support by a company's senior management, department management, and company employees and company image.

The results indicate that both participating and non-participating companies have concerns about participating in work-based learning programs and activities. There were differences in the concerns that work-based learning participants had when compared to the concerns of non-participant companies. Both participant and non-participant companies expressed that work-based learning structural issues were their greatest concerns. These structural concerns included union opposition, employee resistance, economic climate, OSHA/labor laws and coordination problems. Concerns regarding students and their actual participation in work-based learning programs were secondary to the structural issues for both participating and non-participating companies. These secondary concerns included students' leaving the program, student immaturity, student availability and students' lacking skills. These concerns were more pronounced in the participating companies than the non-participating companies.

Indexing (details)


Subject
Vocational education;
School administration;
Business education
Classification
0747: Vocational education
0514: School administration
0688: Business education
Identifier / keyword
Education; Business support; Nebraska; Omaha; Work-based learning
Title
Omaha business support for work -based learning
Author
Bigsby, Keith E.
Number of pages
66
Publication year
2004
Degree date
2004
School code
1060
Source
DAI-A 66/05, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
ISBN
9780542148347, 054214834X
Advisor
McKay, Jack; Schulte, Laura
University/institution
University of Nebraska at Omaha
University location
United States -- Nebraska
Degree
Ed.D.
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Language
English
Document type
Dissertation/Thesis
Dissertation/thesis number
3175881
ProQuest document ID
305058988
Copyright
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
http://search.proquest.com/docview/305058988
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.