Abstract/Details

Shop Talk: An evaluation of a salon -based breast and cervical cancer intervention for African American women


2004 2004

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

Lay health education is recognized as an acceptable strategy used with communities and serves as a practical approach to health promotion. Currently in the United States, lay health education methods are widely used to recruit diverse populations for a variety of public health concerns, including recent application to a breast and cervical cancer screening intervention, Shop Talk. Shop Talk trained local African American beauticians to promote breast and cervical cancer awareness, distribute health literature, and increase awareness of the Alabama Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program among their clientele.

It is not clear how current techniques such as Shop Talk may potentially represent an effective approach for promoting the adoption of cancer screening practices and subsequently reducing morbidity and mortality. For efficient replication, lay health educator programs targeting breast and cervical cancer among African American women require a thorough understanding of specific program processes and activities. But there has been little published research thus far that has utilized process evaluation, specifically, as a method to gather and analyze this information.

Toward this end, the current study set out to reveal the complexities involved in implementing the Shop Talk program. The evaluation included both process and impact components. The main component of this study was process evaluation which focused on describing the program implementation including the beauticians training provided. The impact evaluation component complemented the process evaluation by focusing on assessment of program effectiveness with respect to changes in knowledge, attitudes, and screening behaviors among Shop Talk beauticians. Using a mixed methods design, the evaluation questions were: (1) What are the perceptions of Shop Talk staff, participants and partners about the program? (2) What were the differences regarding breast and cervical knowledge, attitudes, and screening behavior between Shop Talk beauticians and non-Shop Talk beauticians? (3) How did Shop Talk effect beauticians' interactions with their clients during the beautician-client education component? The data analysis revealed three key findings: First, that the program was implemented as planned, with some program areas that need modification. Second, there were no significant differences between Shop Talk beauticians and non-Shop Talk beauticians regarding breast and cervical cancer knowledge, attitudes, and screening behavior, regardless of race. Third, Shop Talk beauticians delivered the message as they were instructed; however, the Training Manual and session content requires some modification to accomplish the most significant impact on clients. Based on the results, several recommendations are suggested for future research.

Indexing (details)


Subject
Health education;
Public health;
Womens studies;
African Americans;
Breast cancer;
Cervical cancer
Classification
0680: Health education
0573: Public health
0453: Womens studies
0325: African Americans
Identifier / keyword
Health and environmental sciences; Social sciences; Education; African-American; Breast cancer; Cancer intervention; Cervical cancer; Lay health education; Shop Talk; Women
Title
Shop Talk: An evaluation of a salon -based breast and cervical cancer intervention for African American women
Author
Clay, Kimberly S.
Number of pages
123
Publication year
2004
Degree date
2004
School code
0005
Source
DAI-A 65/12, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
ISBN
9780496904761, 0496904760
Advisor
Crowther, Martha R.
University/institution
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
University location
United States -- Alabama
Degree
Ph.D.
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Language
English
Document type
Dissertation/Thesis
Dissertation/thesis number
3157893
ProQuest document ID
305211907
Copyright
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
http://search.proquest.com/docview/305211907
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.