Abstract/Details

Heroes and villains: Cultural narratives, mass opinions, and climate change


2010 2010

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

Global climate change is easily identified as one of the most pressing and contentious policy problems facing not only the United States, but the human race. In a democratic society such as our own, understanding the public's capacities and tendencies in processing information and forming opinions about climate change has serious and far-reaching policy implications. Historically quite low, public knowledge about climate change is now on the rise, as is the importance of the issue on the public agenda (Leiserowitz, 2005). Consequently, it is not unreasonable to expect the public, for better or worse, to play a larger role in future climate policy melees. In light of the prospect of an increasingly important public role in shaping policy contours, this dissertation seeks to test how and why individuals form opinions and assessments of risk about climate change. In order to address these questions, two theories that account for both individual internal factors and external stimuli in opinion formation and change are merged to create a Cultural Narrative Model (CNM).

The first, Cultural Theory (CT), argues that there are four exclusive value orientations to which individuals subscribe based upon preferred levels of group interaction and the degree that these groups are expected to constrain the individual's beliefs and behavior. These value orientations are always present and influence how incoming information is processed (Wildavsky, 1987; Thompson et al., 1990). CT has a proven history of explaining variation in opinion and risk perceptions (Wildavsky & Dake, 1990); however, the influence of message structures in CT scholarship is lacking. This research operationalizes narrative theory to address this gap. Seeking to determine if cultural narratives help explain variations in climate change opinion related dependent variables, two research questions are addressed: RQ1: Narrative Structure: Does narrative structure influence opinions related to climate change? RQ2: Cultural Narrative Content: Does cultural narrative content explain variation in opinions related to climate change?

Specific hypotheses derived from the above research questions are tested using an online internet survey with a built in experimental design. Four experimental tracks are employed, including a control list and three cultural narrative treatments. Several statistical tools, including analysis of variance and OLS regression analysis are used to assess each hypothesis. The survey sample consists of roughly fifteen-hundred nationally representative respondents surveyed from within the United States.

Findings indicate that while cultural content does not appear to influence opinions about climate change, narrative structure plays a powerful role in shaping opinion. Specifically, findings show that the vehicle through which narrative structure persuades is the hero character. Examining eleven climate change opinion related variables, as positive affect for the hero increases so too do respondent preferences and beliefs in direction specified by the cultural narrative treatments.

Indexing (details)


Subject
Cultural anthropology;
Environmental Studies;
Political science;
Public policy
Classification
0326: Cultural anthropology
0477: Environmental Studies
0615: Political science
0630: Public policy
Identifier / keyword
Health and environmental sciences; Social sciences; Climate change; Cultural theory; Global warming; Narrative; Narrative analysis; Public opinion
Title
Heroes and villains: Cultural narratives, mass opinions, and climate change
Author
Jones, Michael D.
Number of pages
306
Publication year
2010
Degree date
2010
School code
0169
Source
DAI-A 71/05, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
ISBN
9781109755411
Advisor
Jenkins-Smith, Hank C.
Committee member
Gaddie, Ronald Keith; Kahan, Dan; Krutz, Glen; Spicer, Paul
University/institution
The University of Oklahoma
Department
Department of Political Science
University location
United States -- Oklahoma
Degree
Ph.D.
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Language
English
Document type
Dissertation/Thesis
Dissertation/thesis number
3402912
ProQuest document ID
305218173
Copyright
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
http://search.proquest.com/docview/305218173
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.