Abstract/Details

The design and utilization of effective worked examples: A meta -analysis


2006 2006

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

The use of worked examples represents an alternative instructional method to that of problem-solving in highly structured domains such as physics and computer programming. The benefits of worked examples may be measured in posttest performance scores, and lower cognitive load in the form of less perceived mental effort. However, for worked examples to be effective, research into the range of different design components is crucial for creation of effective worked examples. Such components include intra-example features, such as the integration of source information with diagrammatic or auditory material, labeling or cueing of problem subgoals, and faded solution steps, and training in self-explanation strategies. Inter-example features such as the presentation of multiple examples, using example/problem pairs, and varying surface stories and problem types, are also important components of effective worked examples. A meta-analysis of multiple studies that employ various forms of worked examples instructional techniques was conducted. Mental effort ratings and posttest performance scores were used to calculate the standardized mean difference effect sizes for each study.

The findings of this study showed that worked examples indeed represent a benefit to learning, with certain features and/or environments producing greater benefits than others. When the general analysis was broken down into intra-example features and self-explanation training, the results showed that faded solution steps demonstrated the strongest effect in favor or worked example instruction, followed by self-explanation training. Conventional worked examples, integrations, and subgoals also represented moderate effects. Inter-example features such as presenting multiple examples per problem type and surface story variation produced better outcomes in terms of posttest scores compared to when these features were not present. Prior knowledge was also a factor in the efficacy of worked examples as students with little to no prior knowledge benefited more than those that had prior knowledge in the domain.

Indexing (details)


Subject
Curricula;
Teaching
Classification
0727: Curricula
0727: Teaching
Identifier / keyword
Education, Cognitive load, Problem-solving, Worked examples
Title
The design and utilization of effective worked examples: A meta -analysis
Author
Crissman, Jennifer K.
Number of pages
200
Publication year
2006
Degree date
2006
School code
0138
Source
DAI-A 67/02, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
ISBN
0542559447, 9780542559440
Advisor
Isernhagen, Jody C.
University/institution
The University of Nebraska - Lincoln
University location
United States -- Nebraska
Degree
Ph.D.
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Language
English
Document type
Dissertation/Thesis
Dissertation/thesis number
3208114
ProQuest document ID
305275876
Copyright
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
http://search.proquest.com/docview/305275876
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.