Residential redevelopment of brownfields: Is human health being protected?

2005 2005

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

This research explored how protection of health is being addressed at brownfields that are being redeveloped for residential uses. An inter-disciplinary literature review informed the research approaches that included: a context analysis of U.S. newspaper stories; a survey of brownfields practitioners on assessing and managing risks; and, case studies in the cities of Elizabeth, NJ, Emeryville, CA, and Trenton, NJ. While newspaper stories about brownfields and housing and health were rare they were mostly reassuring, setting a favorable context. Housing on brownfields has evolved into a viable land use strategy, the survey revealed that nearly 60% of respondents had residential projects in their brownfields portfolio - mixed use predominated. Most respondents favored the use of regulatory cleanup standards and site specific risk management plans to assess risks (73% ranked these first or second) and most favored partial removal with institutional control or cleanup to residential standards or background for remediation (55% ranked these first or second). Half of the respondents indicated that stakeholders were involved in setting risk targets while only 25% of the respondents could be classified as having a proactive disclosure program (such as pre-sale/lease disclosures, advisory committees, etc.). The case studies demonstrated that the survey favored practices were being used to effectively assess and manage risks; incremental risk targets ranged from 1/1,000,000 to 1/100,000 or a Hazard Index of l. The research also revealed the emergence of a ‘hybrid’ risk management framework—a continuum from qualitative hazard assessments/management to more quantitative analysis of hazards and exposure pathways to achieve the desired risk reduction goal. However, in the absence of contaminant removal to background or residential standards, the long-term sustainability of the protective measures is dependent on institutional controls and public disclosure—areas of uncertainty. This research suggests that housing specific policies be developed that incorporate redundant disclosure, monitoring, and notification measures. Policy implications include: federal—examining state programs; states—setting minimum standards for stakeholder involvement and disclosure requirements; local—translating practices into written form and developing notification redundancies for residents and workers; standards organizations—modifying building codes for urban infill construction and developing life-cycle costing for institutional controls.

Indexing (details)

Public health;
Environmental science;
0573: Public health
0768: Environmental science
Identifier / keyword
Health and environmental sciences; Brownfields; Environmental health; Health; Residential redevelopment
Residential redevelopment of brownfields: Is human health being protected?
Ellerbusch, Fred
Number of pages
Publication year
Degree date
School code
DAI-B 66/05, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
9780542157301, 0542157306
Greenberg, Michael
Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick and University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
University location
United States -- New Jersey
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Document type
Dissertation/thesis number
ProQuest document ID
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.