Abstract/Details

Interpreting the “newer knowledge of nutrition”: Science, interests, and values in the making of dietary advice in the United States, 1915–1965


2005 2005

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

This dissertation explores the diversity of interpretations given by health professionals and other Americans to the so-called “newer knowledge of nutrition” between the 1910s and the mid-1960s. Within two decades of the discovery of vitamins in the 1910s, nutrition experts had begun to speculate that the increased use of vitamin- and mineral-rich foods could enhance vitality, defer aging, and extend life; and that many of the common ailments suffered by Americans were caused by the consumption of nutritionally impoverished diets.

These assertions were embraced by some and challenged by others. The great discoveries of the first half of the twentieth century created more uncertainties than they resolved. As a result, disputes emerged as to the composition of the ideal diet, the desirability of consuming particular foods, and usefulness of dietary supplements and vitamin-fortified foods. During these controversies, individuals took sides according to their interests and values. Professions with an antiquackery bias tended to discount the significance of nutrition, whereas those committed to improving the American diet offered an expansive view of the influence of food on health. External circumstances also affected the interpretation of the scientific data. Concerns about national fitness on the eve of World War II led health authorities to maintain that tens of millions of Americans suffered from nutritional deficiencies, despite the tenuousness of the evidence upon which this conclusion was based. Once the war ended and economic prosperity returned, the problem of malnutrition receded from public view, despite evidence showing that many Americans were still eating poorly.

The newer knowledge also gave rise to a grass-roots dietary reform movement dedicated to the proposition that much of the ill health in the United States was caused by the consumption of nutrient-depleted processed foods. Although health authorities maintained that the movement's claims were unscientific, the physicians and dentists who founded the health food movement in the 1930s believed that they were offering legitimate interpretations of nutrition science. Their interpretations, however, were colored (and distorted) by an ideology that held that urban-industrial society and modern food processing methods, in particular, disrupted the natural order and thereby threatened man's well-being.

Indexing (details)


Subject
American history;
Science history;
Nutrition
Classification
0337: American history
0585: Science history
0570: Nutrition
Identifier / keyword
Health and environmental sciences; Social sciences; Dietary advice; Nutrition; Quackery; Science; Values
Title
Interpreting the “newer knowledge of nutrition”: Science, interests, and values in the making of dietary advice in the United States, 1915–1965
Author
Ackerman, Michael
Number of pages
765
Publication year
2005
Degree date
2005
School code
0246
Source
DAI-A 66/03, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
ISBN
9780542046094, 0542046091
Advisor
Kett, Joseph F.
University/institution
University of Virginia
University location
United States -- Virginia
Degree
Ph.D.
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Language
English
Document type
Dissertation/Thesis
Dissertation/thesis number
3168455
ProQuest document ID
305381276
Copyright
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
http://search.proquest.com/docview/305381276
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.