Abstract/Details

A historical-theological critique of the new perspective on Paul


2010 2010

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

This dissertation argues that the new perspective on Paul rests on a faulty heremeneutical presupposition. This presupposition is that covenantal nomism (as advocated by E. P. Sanders as a proper conception of Second Temple Judaism) could not have served as a foil for Paul in the development of a doctrine of justification that resembles that of the Reformation. The presupposition is faulty because Sanders's portrayal of Judaism as grace-based has no bearing on the categories that defined the shape of the doctrine of justification during the Reformation period and beyond. The study neither accepts nor rejects Sanders's portrayal of Judaism. Instead, it accepts Sanders's claim for the sake of argument and then demonstrates that his claim does not warrant a radical revision of the Reformation approach to the Pauline writings.

Chapter 1 demonstrates the strong dependence of the new perspective on Sanders's work and the hermeneutical presupposition that his work Paul and Palestinian Judaism has generated.

Chapter 2 sets the historical-theological background for the thesis by surveying important works in the pre-Reformation Catholic scholastic period, as well as the decree of the Council of Trent on justification, in order to demonstrate that, much like covenantal nomism, the emerging Roman Catholicism of the late medieval and Reformation periods was a grace-based, yet monocovenantal, religion.

Chapter 3 surveys the works of three prominent Reformers—Martin Luther, Philip Melanchthon, and John Calvin—in order to demonstrate that what defines the Reformation doctrine of justification is not grace per se but rather a doctrine of alien righteousness, situated within a bicovenantal framework, in which there is an uncompromising divine demand for perfect obedience.

Chapter 4 traces the same themes—perfect obedience, bicovenantalism, and alien righteousness—into the post-Reformation period in order to demonstrate that these are the categories that define the "old perspective" on Paul.

Chapter 5 summarizes the foregoing observations, argues that the new perspective's hermeneutical presupposition is unwarranted, and then concludes with exegetical observations that demonstrate a bicovenantal theology in Paul that is similar to that of the Reformation doctrine of justification, one that could have easily arisen in the context of a prevailing covenantal nomism.

Indexing (details)


Subject
Biblical studies;
Divinity;
Theology
Classification
0321: Biblical studies
0376: Divinity
0469: Theology
Identifier / keyword
Philosophy, religion and theology; Bicovenantalism; Covenantal nomism; Imputation; Justification; New perspective on Paul; Paul the Apostle, Saint
Title
A historical-theological critique of the new perspective on Paul
Author
O'Kelley, Aaron Thomas
Number of pages
231
Publication year
2010
Degree date
2010
School code
0207
Source
DAI-A 72/04, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
ISBN
9781124493244
Advisor
Allison, Gregg R.
University/institution
The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary
University location
United States -- Kentucky
Degree
Ph.D.
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Language
English
Document type
Dissertation/Thesis
Dissertation/thesis number
3445601
ProQuest document ID
856123937
Copyright
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
http://search.proquest.com/docview/856123937
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.