Abstract/Details

The politics of non-incremental school finance reform: A case study analysis of Vermont's Act 60 as a test of Mazzoni's arena model


2011 2011

Other formats: Order a copy

Abstract (summary)

This research, grounded in political theory, had two major purposes: (1) to explain a case of non-incremental policy change within the realm of school finance reform; and (2) to test the utility of Mazzoni's (1991) arena model for explaining state-level school finance policymaking. These goals were accomplished through an examination of the Vermont state legislature's policymaking process in response to the Vermont Supreme Court Brigham v. State (1997) ruling declaring the state's system of school finance unconstitutional. This analysis sought to explain how key political actors, taking advantage of favorable reform conditions, utilized power derived from positional authority as well as personal influence to impact the passage of Act 60, an innovative and forcefully redistributive piece of school finance legislation.

The research employed a qualitative case method as a means to answer the research questions. Data collection drew from an informant interview process supported by extensive primary and secondary source document review. Data were systematically analyzed against the conceptual framework, presented in a case narrative and discussed in light of related literature to generate analytic conclusions with regard to the process of state education policymaking for school finance.

Study findings highlight the general utility of Mazzoni's arena model in explaining non-incremental policy change in the realm of school finance reform; the importance of politically savvy and well-situated policy entrepreneurs who can take advantage of propitious events such as a court ruling to advance non-incremental policy reform; and the role of political elites in advancing the cause of school finance reform. Suggestions for future research include the potential refinement of the arena model to include a judicial arena and the use of other policy frameworks to analyze non-incremental policy innovation for school finance.

Indexing (details)


Subject
Education finance;
Education Policy
Classification
0277: Education finance
0458: Education Policy
Identifier / keyword
Education; Act 60; Arena model; Mazzoni's arena model; Mazzoni, Tim L.; Politics of education; School finance reform; State education policymaking; Vermont
Title
The politics of non-incremental school finance reform: A case study analysis of Vermont's Act 60 as a test of Mazzoni's arena model
Author
Curtis, Kimberly Anne
Number of pages
477
Publication year
2011
Degree date
2011
School code
0117
Source
DAI-A 73/06, Dissertation Abstracts International
Place of publication
Ann Arbor
Country of publication
United States
ISBN
9781267188304
Advisor
Malen, Betty
Committee member
Andrews, J. E.; Croninger, Robert; McLaughlin, Margaret; Rice, Jennifer K.
University/institution
University of Maryland, College Park
Department
Education Policy, and Leadership
University location
United States -- Maryland
Degree
Ph.D.
Source type
Dissertations & Theses
Language
English
Document type
Dissertation/Thesis
Dissertation/thesis number
3495372
ProQuest document ID
923618673
Copyright
Database copyright ProQuest LLC; ProQuest does not claim copyright in the individual underlying works.
Document URL
http://search.proquest.com/docview/923618673
Access the complete full text

You can get the full text of this document if it is part of your institution's ProQuest subscription.

Try one of the following:

  • Connect to ProQuest through your library network and search for the document from there.
  • Request the document from your library.
  • Go to the ProQuest login page and enter a ProQuest or My Research username / password.