Content area
Full Text
mais est-ce qu'on peut mettre le tout en vrac en jet continu personne ne pourra naviguer là-dedans c'est sûr la ponctuation est nécessaire la ponctuation vieux c'est la métaphysique elle-même en personne y compris les blancs les scansions
(H, 14)
With typical ironic self-parody, Philippe Sollers describes the revolutionary prose of his Paradis as "that thing without punctuation": "mais vous savez bien que c'est impossible à lire une fois de plus votre truc là sans ponctuation sans raison" (Paradis 2: 114), in which he channels the disquieted and obviously disapproving reader.1 One such would be the typical book reviewer for a newspaper: "l'un d'eux raconte peut-être en dix lignes la parution de paradis 2 vous savez ce truc sans ponctuation milliers de grains noirs serrés illisible absolument illisible on n'a jamais vu ça sur la liste des best-sellers n'est-ce pas non" (2: 130). Always attentive to his reception among readers, Sollers captures their tone precisely. Upon publication of the first volume of Paradis in 1981, a book lacking capital letters, paragraphs, and punctuation and printed in small, dark italic type, the absence of punctuation was invariably mentioned by professional critics and ordinary readers alike. But Sollers has repeatedly claimed that Paradis is actually overpunctuated; only visible punctuation is absent. When I interviewed him in November 1999, for instance, he compared his writing to the ancient tradition of Greek oral poetry: "tout peut être, tout doit être, selon la virtuosité du chanteur. En réalité c'est très ponctué. Mais les signes de ponctuation ne conviennent pas. C'est très ponctué" (Mortimer, Interview of Sollers). The perceptive Philippe Forest has also observed that Paradis is radically and profoundly punctuated, even overpunctuated, and he notes that without ordinary punctuation to determine meaning, we read rhythmically, giving the text a scansion instead of a form (Philippe Sollers 203). With ordinary punctuation, capital letters, and paragraph breaks and other possible divisions (chapters, sections, blank lines) lacking, what serves for invisible punctuation in this remarkable text? And why does Sollers seek its seditious effects?
Paradis suffered widespread incomprehension and provoked unrestrained scorn. Roland Barthes's 1978 Sollers écrivain opens with an imaginary dialogue in which an antagonist criticizes Paradis as it had been appearing, without explanation, serialized in the opening pages of every issue...