Content area
Full Text
For a brief period in 1919, Paris became the capital of the world. World leaders gathered in conference to forge the terms of the peace. The Allied-led Peace Conference is probably best remembered for the treaty signed in July1919, detailing the terms of Germany's defeat. The greatest task, however, lay not in defining Germany's penance but in designing a new world. This not only involved the construction of new geo-political borders and the redistribution of colonies but also the creation of a new international order. Politicians, intellectuals, and activists as diverse as J. C. Smuts, Vladimir Lenin, H. G. Wells, and Ho Chi Minh had penned competing proposals of this reconstruction in the years before the armistice. The vision that proved the most influential was that offered by the United States President Woodrow Wilson in a speech delivered to the American Congress in 1918, and thereafter known as Wilson's Fourteen Points. His plan, with its emphasis on self-determination and national rights, seemed to suggest the beginning of a world order free from European imperialism. Wilson's inspiring rhetoric gave rise to powerful expectations, particularly amongst those who stood to gain the most from a disruption of the status quo. Within the United States, disenfranchised groups believed that this was their opportunity to have their suffering addressed by a global audience. The African American community was no exception and activist groups as varied as the Universal Negro Improvement Association and the National Urban League lobbied to participate in the Peace Conference or to join Wilson's advisory board.
As historian Erez Manela has observed, the literature on the Paris Peace Conference focuses primarily on great power leaders or specifically upon the conference's failure to realize the promise of Wilson's rhetoric (123). Seminal scholarship, such as Margaret Macmillan's Paris 1919: Six Months that Changed the World, has focused on the reactions of the great powers to the requests of oppressed peoples rather than upon the requests themselves.1 More recent works, such as Glenda Sluga's Internationalism in the Age of Nationalism and The Nation, Psychology and International Politics, 1870-1919 have recovered new dimensions of the process by examining the Peace Conference through the participation of marginalized groups instead of through the actions of the key powerbrokers. Manela himself has filled...