Content area
Full Text
Introduction
Teaching Euripides' Ion in an undergraduate course filled with upperclassmen makes the contemporariness of the tragedy impossible to ignore. Having a sexual assault victim step forward to publicly condemn the god who violated her strongly resonates with much of our socio-political reality today. Creusa's role in the play is not only that of someone who says "me too," but who also publicly denounces her abuser, risking the god's wrath. The significance of Euripides' tragedy for truth-telling today was highlighted when Michel Foucault shifted his attention towards parrhēsia1 in the last years of his life. Ion is only one of the many Greek texts Foucault has referred to, but it is seen by him as a parrhesiastic play par excellence. The distinctness of this tragedy is that the truth is no longer revealed to humans by the gods, and so "human beings must manage, by themselves, to discover and to tell the truth" (Foucault 2001a, 44). Foucault's argument that Ion "concerns the human fight for the truth against god's silence" (2001a, 44) has powerful implications allowing us to theorize a secular, human-generated truth against the transcendental truth of power and to reflect on our own current responsibilities in relation to that truth.
The sense that humans can create and transmit knowledge despite the gods' reticence or even deceit might initially appear to be in contradiction with Foucault's perceived negativity and nihilism. In fact, contemplating an "outside" of the Prison cell might feel contrary to the kind of writing Foucault is famous for, causing his work to be often equated with the "carceral society."2 However, this is the direction Foucault was heading, manifested more prominently in his later work, and more overtly seen in his notion of "limit attitude" appearing in his well-known, posthumously published essay "What Is Enlightenment?"
An important instance of (mis)interpreting Foucault is his critique of Kant, which is often read as a rejection of the Enlightenment, and by extension, of modernity. More ardent or faithful readers of Foucault, however, might recognize that Foucault does not dismiss the Enlightenment, but rather, perceives its philosophical ethos and particularly the reflection on one's own time as an essential element of his own work. In this critique of Kant's "Was ist Aufklärung," Foucault points to a...