It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Research suggests that metaphors can facilitate attitude change in psychotherapy. Based on social influence theory (Strong, 1968) and the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM; Petty & Cacioppo, 1986) of persuasion, this analogue study tested the impact of metaphor use in the context of advice as a therapeutic intervention. In an experimental design, 138 adult participants were randomly assigned to observe a brief videotaped vignette in which a therapist’s advice to a client either did or did not include a novel metaphor. After observing the video, participants completed a measure of therapist credibility, the Counselor Rating Form-Short Version (CRF-S; Corrigan & Schmidt, 1983), the Cognitive Involvement subscale from the Elaboration Likelihood Model Questionnaire (ELMQ-CI; Heppner et al., 1995), and rated the impact of the advice on a modified Tasks Impact subscale from the Session Impact Scale (SIS-TI; Elliott & Wexler, 1994).
It was hypothesized that (a) advice that included a metaphor would predict greater advice impact (SIS-TI), over and above perceived therapist credibility (CRF-S), (b) credibility would also predict advice impact, and (c) the relation between metaphor use and advice impact would be mediated by greater cognitive involvement with the advice (ELMQ-CI). Results supported the second hypothesis only; the relation between metaphor use and advice impact was nonsignificant, but perceived credibility did predict advice impact, accounting for 20% of the variance. Although the third hypothesis was not tested due to the lack of a direct effect, additional analyses showed that, with CRF-S scores covaried, metaphor use significantly predicted ELMQ-CI scores, which in turn significantly predicted SIS-TI scores. These findings suggested that the use of a metaphor may increase the client’s cognitive elaboration of a therapist’s advice, and greater cognitive elaboration may prompt acceptance of that advice. In other words, consistent with ELM, cognitive involvement (central route processing) seems to account for attitude change, with metaphors potentially prompting greater cognitive involvement. However, in this study, metaphor use was not predictive of greater attitude change. Results are discussed in light of the study’s strengths and limitations, their implications for theory, practice, and future research.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer