It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
This thesis examines some of the personalities and institutions that were involved in the evolution of the four-field approach in anthropology through various historical periods into what it is today. With changing views and budget cuts, it is possible that the four-field approach in the United States will break apart. If this were to happen it could change the face of anthropology as we know it. Anthropology and the four-field approach has been evolving for over one-hundred years, and although it has at times come under attack by scholars in other fields, the four-field approach is the reason for our understanding of past civilizations, as well as understanding the similarities and differences of living societies. To allow the four-field approach to be split into several separate departments would be detrimental to the continuing study of human beings, past and present.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer