- Preview Available
- Book
Argumentum anti-normannicum, or, An argument proving, from ancient histories and records, that William, Duke of Normandy, made no absolute conquest of England by the Sword, in the sense of our modern writers being an answer to these four questions, viz. I. Whether William the First made an absolute conquest of this nation at his first entrance?, II. Whether he cancelled and abolished all the confessor's laws?, III. Whether he divided all our estates and fortunes between himself and his nobles?, IV. Whether it be not a grand error to affirm, that there were no English-men in the Common Council of the whole Kingdom?
Alternate title: Argument proving, from ancient histories and records, that William, Duke of Normandy, made no absolute conquest of England.
Bibliographic name/number: Arber's Term cat. / I 496; Wing / C5998A.
Anonymous. EEBO Cambridge University Library records - unstructured. [10], clxiv p. :. London: Printed by J.D. for Mat. Keinton, Jonath. Robinson, Sam. Sprint, 1682.
Bibliographic name/number: Arber's Term cat. / I 496; Wing / C5998A.
Anonymous. EEBO Cambridge University Library records - unstructured. [10], clxiv p. :. London: Printed by J.D. for Mat. Keinton, Jonath. Robinson, Sam. Sprint, 1682.
You might have access to the full article...
Try and log in through your institution to see if they have access to the full text.