1. Introduction
Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have recently become research hotspots because they are widely applied not only in battlefields but also in commerce, industry, and public safety [1]. Wireless communication of UAV is a basic necessity and is normally categorized into control and non-payload communication (CNPC) as well as payload communication (PC) [2]. The former refers to communications between the UAV and ground base station (GBS) to ensure safe and reliable flight operation, which typically includes command and data, air traffic control data, and avoid data for UAV. The latter refers to all mission-related information transmission between UAV and GBS, such as aerial images, high-speed video, and data packets for relaying. Clearly, UAV CNPC desires high reliability, while UAV PC prefers a high data rate [3]. Single-carrier frequency-domain equalization (SC-FDE) is a technology commonly used in UAV payload communication. Compared with Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM), SC-FDE has the advantages of low peak-to-average ratio [4] and low transmission complexity [5], less sensitivity to frequency offset [6], and more energy efficiency [7], which is suitable for UAV communication. When combined with FFT processing and the use of a cyclic prefix (CP), SC-FDE can eliminate intersymbol interference (ISI) caused by multipath effects [8,9].
As a wireless communication system, the UAV PC must be affected by the multipath effect, which leads to performance degradation [10]. Multipath channel consists of line-of-sight (LOS) path and multiple non-line-of-sight (NLOS) path [11]. The LOS path is the direct path between the receiver and the transmitter. The NLOS path is the path reached by reflection and scattering. When the UAV flies at low altitude, the LOS path between the UAV and the ground station is easily blocked by buildings and trees, leading to non-line-of-sight (NLOS) communication [12,13,14]. There are significant differences between NLOS communication and LOS communication. In contrast to LOS communication, the power of the signal arriving through the LOS path in NLOS communication is very low and may even be zero. This means that the power of signals reached by other paths in NLOS communication accounts for a large proportion of the total signal power [15]. Then, the multipath effect of UAV NLOS communication is more significant, and the UAV communication performance degrades more seriously.
As is well known, the most common UAV channel model for LOS communication is the Ricean channel. For the NLOS case, the Rayleigh channel model typically provides a better fit [16,17,18]. A distinctive feature of the Rayleigh channel is that its path with maximum power (PwMP) may not be the first arrival path (FAP), which will cause time offset during synchronization and later intersymbol interference (LISI). The interpretation of LISI is that the decision of the current symbol is interfered with by later symbols. Experiments show that LISI will lead to a significant increase in the UAV communication bit error rate (BER). In a LOS channel, there is only preceding intersymbol interference (PISI), i.e., the decision of the current symbol is interfered with only by preceding symbols. PISI is known as ISI.
Inspired by the elimination of ISI, i.e., PISI, through CP, this paper eliminates LISI through cyclic suffix (CS). In [19,20,21], CS is applied to the super-Nyquist technology to eliminate interblock interference (IBI). These references did not analyze the principle of the CS and clarify the relationship between the CS and NLOS communication. Since PISI and LISI exist in NLOS communication, the SC-FDE NLOS communication scheme based on CP and CS for UAV PC is proposed in this paper. The main contributions of our work are given as follows.
-
(1). We investigate the reason behind the generation of LISI in UAV NLOS communication. Moreover, the frame structure of conventional SC-FDE with CP (CP-SC-FDE) is improved, and we design an NLOS communication scheme based on SC-FDE with CP and CS (CP/CS-SC-FDE) for UAV PC. In addition, the scheme can be compatible with both LOS and NLOS communication.
-
(2). A channel estimation algorithm applicable to this scheme is proposed, which can eliminate the ISI in UAV NLOS communication. Compared with the conventional CP-SC-FDE system, this scheme can achieve excellent performance in Rayleigh channel simulation. Moreover, the scheme does not need to eliminate the time synchronization offset but can achieve the same performance as the ideal synchronization.
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces the related works. Section 3 introduces the system model of CP-SC-FDE in UAV LOS communication. Section 4 presents the NLOS communication scheme based on CP/CS-SC-FDE for UAV PC. Numerical results are given in Section 5, and conclusions are given in Section 6.
2. Related Work
In [22], recognizing the fact that the maximal power path is not always the first path in channel impulse response (CIR), that is, there are paths with earlier arrival time but with weaker power, which results in ISI if the FFT window is not set ahead of them, it is suggested to bring forward the estimated time index by some amount. In order to eliminate the time synchronization offset, the key is to search for the FAP after capturing the PwMP. Existing methods can generally be classified into four categories [23]: Maximum Likelihood (ML) approaches [24], Matched Filter (MF)-based detectors [25,26], energy-based detectors [27,28,29] and machine learning-based approaches [30,31,32].
In [33], multipath components of measured waveforms are detected using a Maximum Likelihood (ML) detector. The ML estimator is theoretically asymptotically efficient, but its high computational complexity makes it challenging to implement. In [34], a three-step MF detection-based algorithm is proposed. First, the search region for FAP detection is determined; then, a rough detection of FAP is made by a threshold that is dynamically set using the MF output; last, a refined search process is carried out to obtain the precise location of the FAP. However, MF cannot perform satisfactorily in the low signal-noise ratio (SNR) region. In [28], to estimate the time of arrival in impulse radio ultra wideband ranging under harsh environments, the rank test is adopted in the study to detect the FAP in a dense multipath with energy detection receiver. In [35], the machine learning-based approaches are used to identify LoS and NLoS. They generally consist of data collection, feature extraction, model training and regression, which may have extremely high computational demand when the training data size becomes large. However, none of these methods can guarantee the accurate search of the first path; that is, they cannot completely eliminate the synchronization offset. Moreover, these methods add complexity to the system. Since LOS communication does not require searching FAP, computing resources will be wasted to be compatible with LOS communication.
In addition, to realize the communication in the NLOS scenario, UAV relay technology [36,37] and reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS) technology [38,39] are also adopted. These two technologies require additional hardware to implement and are therefore not considered.
3. The System Model of CP-SC-FDE in UAV LOS Communication
The transceiver structure of CP-SC-FDE in UAV LOS communication is shown in Figure 1. At the transmitting end, the CP is appended before the preambles and data symbols, respectively. Then, in the framing module, they are grouped into a block. The receiver consists of modules for synchronization, channel estimation, and equalization. The synchronization module only considers time synchronization relevant to this study.
Let us consider a CP-SC-FDE system where preambles and data symbols, represented by vectors and respectively, are grouped into a block. M and N represent the length of the preambles and data symbols, respectively. Moreover, a CP of length C is appended to and . Thus, a block can be represented as , as shown in Figure 2. The preambles are used to perform time synchronization and channel estimation.
Assume that the multipath channel is , through which the resulting block is transmitted. L represents the length of the multipath channel and is the i-th path of the multipath channel. Moreover, the received signal is expressed as
(1)
where is discrete thermal noise. At the receiver of UAV communication system, the local preambles are used to perform a sliding correlation with the received signal to complete the time synchronization. The sliding correlation result, with not considered, is represented as(2)
When , can be represented as
(3)
If it is LOS communication, the PwMP of the multipath channel is the first path, i.e.,(4)
According to the correlation property of the preambles, the correlation peak is
(5)
which corresponds to the start of the preambles. According to it, the CP is removed. Due to the CP, the discrete time-domain linear convolution is converted to discrete-time cyclic convolution, i.e.,(6)
It can be expressed as a matrix
(7)
where denotes the cyclic convolution matrix(8)
is a right-circulant matrix [40], and each of its row vectors is a right-circulant shift of the previous row vector. The first column corresponds to the channel vector . In addition, according to the properties of the right circulant matrix, , can be decomposed into(9)
where H denotes the Hermitian transpose, is the Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) matrix, and is a diagonal matrix with its eigenvalues given by(10)
If the influence of noise is not considered, the time domain result of channel estimation using the preambles is .
4. The NLOS Communication Scheme Based on CP/CS-SC-FDE
4.1. CP-SC-FDE VS CP/CS-SC-FDE
In this subsection, the reason behind the generation of LISI in UAV NLOS communication is shown. Figure 3 shows the FFT regions of channel estimation and equalization in the LOS channel and the NLOS channel based on CP-SC-FDE. As is shown in part 2 of Figure 3, through a multipath channel, the received signal is a delayed superposition of the transmitted signal. In UAV LOS communication, corresponding to the blue CIR in part 1 of Figure 3, the PwMP of the multipath channel is the first path. As is shown in part 3 of Figure 3, . Moreover, the FFT regions for channel estimation and equalization contain only information from the preambles, i.e., the preambles and the multipath channel satisfy cyclic convolution. Therefore, the receiver can achieve channel equalization correctly.
However, in UAV NLOS communication, corresponding to the red CIR in the part 1 of Figure 3, the PwMP of the multipath channel is not the first path. Assume that
(11)
Then,
(12)
which is shown in part 3 of Figure 3. In UAV NLOS communication, time synchronization occurs with an unavoidable time offset (TO). Moreover, the FFT region for channel estimation will introduce ISI from the later symbols of preambles, i.e., LISI, causing the preambles and the multipath channel not to satisfy the cyclic convolution. The channel equalization will be wrong.Therefore, for UAV NLOS communication, we design a communication scheme based on CP/CS-SC-FDE, the block of which is shown in Figure 2. Figure 4 shows the FFT regions of channel estimation and equalization in the LOS channel and NLOS channel based on CP/CS-SC-FDE. As is shown in part 2 of Figure 4, even if the time synchronization occurs with an unavoidable TO in UAV NLOS communication, the channel estimation region will not introduce LISI as long as the length of the CS is larger than the TO. So, the preambles and multipath channel still satisfy the cyclic convolution. Moreover, the channel equalization will be right.
4.2. The Channel Estimation Algorithm of CP/CS-SC-FDE for UAV PC
In a CP/CS-SC-FDE system, assume that the length of the CS is D. Moreover, assume that in the multipath channel, the number of symbol intervals between the PwMP and the first and last path are E and F, respectively. C, D, E, and F satisfy
(13)
Then, . When ,
(14)
And,
(15)
Then,
(16)
which corresponds to the start of the preambles. According to it, the CP and CS are removed. Due to the CP and CS, the discrete time-domain linear convolution is converted to discrete-time cyclic convolution, i.e.,(17)
It can be expressed as a matrix
(18)
where the cyclic convolution matrix of (7) becomes , i.e.,(19)
can be decomposed into
(20)
where is a diagonal matrix with its eigenvalues given by(21)
If the influence of noise is not considered, the time-domain result of the channel estimation using the preambles is , which is the cyclic shift of .
By determining that in Formula (17), we obtain
(22)
Moreover, it is converted to the frequency domain through a DFT, denoted by
(23)
where , , and stand for the DFT of , , and respectively. In this CP/CS-SC-FDE system, the channel estimation algorithm is based on the frequency domain Least Square (LS) algorithm. Then,(24)
which is converted to the time domain through an inverse DFT (IDFT), denoted by(25)
Once the channel estimation for the preamble position is obtained, the channel estimation for the data position is calculated through an interpolation algorithm, i.e.,
(26)
Let denote the n-th element of . The pseudocode of the channel estimation algorithm is shown in Algorithm 1.
Algorithm 1 Channel estimation algorithm of CP/CS-SC-FDE |
Input: , ; |
Output: ; |
1: Perform an M-point DFT transformation on ; |
2: Obtain the channel frequency response Using LS estimation ; |
3: Obtain by performing an M-point IDFT transformation on ; |
4: Set ; |
5: for all do |
6: if then |
7: ; |
8: else if then |
9: ; |
10: end if |
11: end for |
12: return . |
5. Numerical Results
5.1. Simulation Results of Time Synchronization Offset and Channel Estimation in LOS and NLOS Channels
In the first simulation, we evaluate the impact of the LOS and NLOS channels on the time synchronization offset, as well as the results of channel estimation in CP/CS-SC-FDE. Table 1 contains the parameters and respective settings of the simulations.
The channel considered includes a LOS UAV channel and two NLOS UAV channels, corresponding to channels 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The LOS UAV channel is an outcome of the Rice fading channel. The two NLOS UAV channels are outcomes of the Rayleigh fading channel. The channel is assumed constant during a transmission block in all the results. The CIRs of three channels are shown in Figure 5. As seen from Figure 5, each of the three channels has 8 non-zero taps. Channel 1 is the LOS channel, whose PwMP is the first path. Channel 2 and channel 3 are NLOS channels whose PwMPs are the middle and last paths, respectively. The selection of three channels is very representative. Moreover, the key parameters of these three channels are shown in Table 2.
The sliding correlation values for time synchronization under these three channels are presented in Figure 6. As shown in Figure 6, in channel 1, the correlation peak is , which corresponds to the synchronization point 64, and there is no TO. Under channels 2 and 3, the correlation peak is , which corresponds to the synchronization point 92 and 124, and there is a TO, which is equal to E. The results of are also shown in Table 2. Therefore, there is no TO under the LOS UAV channel, whereas there is a TO with the value E under the NLOS UAV channel.
Figure 7 shows the channel estimation results in a CP-SC-FDE system. Due to the TO in the CP-SC-FDE system, the FFT region of channel estimation and equalization will introduce LISI. Comparing Figure 5 and Figure 7, it can be seen that there is an error in the channel estimation in the CP-SC-FDE system. As a comparison, Figure 8 shows the channel estimation result in a CP/CS-SC-FDE system. We can observe that the channel estimation is the cyclic shift of the channel in Figure 5 as deduced in Section 3. In channel 1, E = 0, and the channel estimation result has no cyclic shift. In channel 2, E = 28, and the channel estimation result corresponds to a 28-point cyclic shift. In channel 3, E = 60, and the channel estimation result corresponds to a 60-point cyclic shift.
5.2. BER in Several Classes of NLOS Channels
In the second simulation, we first assess the performance of CP/CS-SC-FDE compared with CP-SC-FDE in the Rayleigh fading channel. The simulation parameters are shown in Table 1. The value of is from 0 to 18 dB. The simulation result is shown in Figure 9. As a reference, the curve of ideal synchronization is also shown. Ideal synchronization means that although PwMP is not the FAP, the synchronization offset caused by NLOS will be manually eliminated. This is equivalent to an accurate search for FAP. Since the FAP searching algorithms in [28,33,34,35] cannot search the FAP accurately, the BER performance of these algorithms must not be as good as that of ideal synchronization. The optimal performance can be achieved under ideal synchronization, so the performance of CP-SC-FDE and CP/CS-SC-FDE systems is investigated and compared with the curve of ideal synchronization in this simulation. According to the above theoretical analysis, CP/CS-SC-FDE can still achieve the same performance as ideal synchronization without eliminating TO. As seen in Figure 9, when the channel is a Rayleigh channel, due to the LISI caused by TO, the BER is poor in the CP-SC-FDE system. On the contrary, in the CP/CS-SC-FDE system, since LISI is eliminated, the BER result is similar to that under ideal synchronization.
Then, we assess the performance of CP/CS-SC-FDE compared with CP-SC-FDE in the COST207-BU channel with 12 non-zero taps and TDL-C channel with 24 non-zero taps, respectively. The COST207-BU channel represents the bad urban scenario from the COST 207 channel model standard [41]. The TDL-C channel represents the bad NLOS scenario from the 3GPP channel model standard [42]. The COST207-BU channel and TDL-C channel are NLOS channels, where the PwMP is not the FAP. The simulation parameters are shown in Table 1. The value of is from 0 to 33 dB. The simulation result is shown in Figure 10. The BER curves of ideal synchronization in COST207-BU and TDL-C channels are also shown as a reference. As seen in Figure 10, the BER is poor in the CP-SC-FDE system. On the contrary, in the CP/CS-SC-FDE system, the BER result is similar to that under ideal synchronization.
6. Conclusions
To improve the performance of NLOS communication for UAV payload communication, we design an NLOS communication scheme based on CP/CS-SC-FDE. We first investigate the reason behind the generation of LISI in NLOS communication. The simulation shows that under the NLOS channel, there is a time offset with the value E, i.e., the number of symbol intervals between the PwMP and the first path, which causes the LISI in NLOS communication. Then, the frame structure of conventional SC-FDE with CP (CP-SC-FDE) is improved, and the UAV NLOS communication scheme based on CP/CS-SC-FDE is designed. Furthermore, a channel estimation algorithm applicable to this scheme is proposed. The numerical results show that this communication scheme can eliminate the ISI in NLOS communication. Compared with the conventional CP-SC-FDE system, this scheme can achieve excellent performance in the Rayleigh channel, COST207-BU channel, and TDL-C channel. In the CP/CS-SC-FDE system, the BER result is similar to that under ideal synchronization. Therefore, this NLOS communication scheme based on CP/CS-SC-FDE can be applied to UAV payload communication in an NLOS scenario where the LOS path is blocked.
Conceptualization, P.W. and X.X.; methodology, P.W.; software, P.W. and Q.L.; formal analysis, P.W. and R.W.; resources, P.D. and P.W.; data curation, Q.L., X.X. and P.W.; writing—original draft, P.W. and R.W.; writing—review and editing, P.W.; visualization, P.D. and Q.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
NLOS | non-line-of-sight |
UAV | unmanned aerial vehicle |
CP | cyclic prefix |
CS | cyclic suffix |
SC-FDE | single-carrier frequency domain equalization |
ISI | intersymbol interference |
LISI | later intersymbol interference |
CNPC | control and non-payload communication |
PC | payload communication |
GBS | ground base station |
PISI | preceding intersymbol interference |
PwMP | path with maximum power |
FAP | first arrival path |
BER | bit error rate |
SNR | signal–noise ratio |
ML | Maximum Likelihood |
MF | Matched Filter |
RIS | reconfigurable intelligent surfaces |
DFT | Discrete Fourier Transform |
CIR | channel impulse response |
TO | time offset |
IDFT | Inverse Discrete Fourier Transform |
LS | Least Square |
AWGN | additive Gaussian white noise |
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Figure 9. The BER curve of CP/CS-SC-FDE compared with CP-SC-FDE in Rayleigh fading channel.
Figure 10. The BER curve of CP/CS-SC-FDE compared with CP-SC-FDE in COST207-BU channel and TDL-C channel.
Simulation parameters.
Parameters | Settings |
---|---|
Modulation type | QPSK |
Preambles type | Zadoff–Chu Sequences |
The length of preambles (M) | 128 |
The length of data (N) | 1024 |
FFT Size | 128/1024 |
The length of CP (C) | 64 |
The length of CS (D) | 0 or 64 |
Channel Model | Rice/Rayleigh fading channel with 8 non-zero taps |
| 20 dB |
Simulation parameters.
Parameters | Channel 1 | Channel 2 | Channel 3 |
---|---|---|---|
E | 0 | 28 | 60 |
F | 51 | 32 | 0 |
| | | |
References
1. Zeng, B.; Zhang, Z.; Ding, X.; Bu, X.; An, J. Predictive decision and reliable accessing for UAV communication in space-air-ground integrated networks. China Commun.; 2022; 19, pp. 166-185. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.23919/JCC.2022.01.013]
2. Wu, Q.; Xu, J.; Zeng, Y.; Ng, D.W.K.; Al-Dhahir, N.; Schober, R.; Swindlehurst, A.L. A Comprehensive Overview on 5G-and-Beyond Networks With UAVs: From Communications to Sensing and Intelligence. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.; 2021; 39, pp. 2912-2945. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2021.3088681]
3. Fan, C.; She, C.; Zhang, H.; Li, B.; Zhao, C.; Niyato, D. Learning to Optimize User Association and Spectrum Allocation With Partial Observation in mmWave-Enabled UAV Networks. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.; 2022; 21, pp. 5873-5888. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2022.3144181]
4. Guerreiro, J.; Dinis, R.; Montezuma, P. Low-Complexity SC-FDE Techniques for Massive MIMO Schemes With Low-Resolution ADCs. IEEE Trans. Commun.; 2019; 67, pp. 2368-2380. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2018.2881462]
5. Lim, K.; Kim, H.; Hong, T.C.; Ahn, J.Y. Wideband channel waveform and structure for unmanned aircraft systems. Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC); Jeju, Republic of Korea, 18–20 October 2017; pp. 1222-1224. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICTC.2017.8190904]
6. Wang, Z.; Pu, F.; Yang, X.; Chen, N.; Shuai, Y.; Yang, R. Online LSTM-Based Channel Estimation for HF MIMO SC-FDE System. IEEE Access; 2020; 8, pp. 131005-131020. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3010359]
7. Viana, J.; Madeira, J.; Nidhi,; Sebastião, P.; Cercas, F.; Mihovska, A.; Dinis, R. Increasing Reliability on UAV Fading Scenarios. IEEE Access; 2022; 10, pp. 30959-30973. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3149588]
8. Lakshmanan, M.; Noormohammed, V.; Nandakumar, S. Frequency domain equalization for single carrier wireless systems. Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Control, Automation, Communication and Energy Conservation; Perundurai, India, 4–6 June 2009; pp. 1-7.
9. Falconer, D.; Ariyavisitakul, S.; Benyamin-Seeyar, A.; Eidson, B. Frequency domain equalization for single-carrier broadband wireless systems. IEEE Commun. Mag.; 2002; 40, pp. 58-66. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/35.995852]
10. Bilbao, I.; Iradier, E.; Montalban, J.; Angueira, P.; Park, S.I. Enhancing Channel Estimation in Terrestrial Broadcast Communications Using Machine Learning. IEEE Trans. Broadcast.; 2024; pp. 1-11. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBC.2024.3417228]
11. Ning, X.; Zeng, M.; Hua, M.; Fei, Z. Multiple Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces Aided Vehicular Edge Computing Networks: A MAPPO-Based Approach. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.; 2024; pp. 1-14. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2024.3419554]
12. Lyu, Y.; Liang, C.; Chen, J.; Chen, P.; Guo, L.; Zhao, J.; Wang, W. Channel Measurements and Analysis for Fixed-Wing UAV-to-Vehicle Communications At 2.7 GHz in Rural Area. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett.; 2024; pp. 1-5. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2024.3453497]
13. Qing, C.; Liu, Z.; Hu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, X.; Du, P. LoS Sensing-Based Channel Estimation in UAV-Assisted OFDM Systems. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett.; 2024; 13, pp. 1320-1324. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LWC.2024.3368652]
14. Ge, C.; Zhai, D.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, R.; Yang, X.; Li, B.; Tang, X. Pathloss and Airframe Shadowing Loss of Air-to-Ground UAV Channel in the Airport Area at UHF- and L-Band. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol.; 2023; 72, pp. 8094-8098. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2023.3242461]
15. Measurement-based fading characteristics analysis and modeling of UAV to vehicles channel. Veh. Commun.; 2024; 45, 100707. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vehcom.2023.100707]
16. Khawaja, W.; Guvenc, I.; Matolak, D.W.; Fiebig, U.C.; Schneckenburger, N. A Survey of Air-to-Ground Propagation Channel Modeling for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor.; 2019; 21, pp. 2361-2391. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2019.2915069]
17. Jiang, F.; Swindlehurst, A.L. Optimization of UAV Heading for the Ground-to-Air Uplink. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.; 2012; 30, pp. 993-1005. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2012.120614]
18. Vahidi, V.; Saberinia, E. Orthogonal frequency division multiplexing and channel models for payload communications of unmanned aerial systems. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS); Arlington, VA, USA, 7–10 June 2016; pp. 1156-1161. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS.2016.7502656]
19. Li, Q.; Gong, F.K.; Song, P.Y.; Li, G.; Zhai, S.H. Beyond DVB-S2X: Faster-Than-Nyquist Signaling With Linear Precoding. IEEE Trans. Broadcast.; 2020; 66, pp. 620-629. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBC.2019.2960941]
20. Hong, S.B.; Seo, J.S. Performance Enhancement of Faster-Than-Nyquist Signaling Based Single-Carrier Frequency-Domain Equalization Systems. IEEE Trans. Broadcast.; 2016; 62, pp. 918-935. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TBC.2016.2593400]
21. Hong, S.B.; Seo, J.S. An efficient insertion of the cyclic prefix/suffix for Frequency Domain Equalization in Faster-than-Nyquist signaling. Proceedings of the 2016 39th International Conference on Telecommunications and Signal Processing (TSP); Vienna, Austria, 27–29 June 2016; pp. 437-440. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2016.7760915]
22. Chan, Y.C.; Tseng, P.H.; Lin, D.B.; Lin, H.P. Maximal power path detection for OFDM timing-advanced synchronization schemes. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 24th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor, and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC); London, UK, 8 September 2013; pp. 192-196. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PIMRC.2013.6666129]
23. Wang, S.; Mao, G.; Zhang, J.A. Joint Time-of-Arrival Estimation for Coherent UWB Ranging in Multipath Environment With Multi-User Interference. IEEE Trans. Signal Process.; 2019; 67, pp. 3743-3755. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2019.2916016]
24. Win, M.; Scholtz, R. Characterization of ultra-wide bandwidth wireless indoor channels: A communication-theoretic view. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.; 2002; 20, pp. 1613-1627. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2002.805031]
25. Dardari, D.; Chong, C.C.; Win, M. Threshold-Based Time-of-Arrival Estimators in UWB Dense Multipath Channels. IEEE Trans. Commun.; 2008; 56, pp. 1366-1378. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2008.050551]
26. Dardari, D.; Chong, C.C.; Win, M.Z. Analysis of threshold-based ToA estimators in UWB channels. Proceedings of the 2006 14th European Signal Processing Conference; Florence, Italy, 4–8 September 2006; pp. 1-6.
27. Kristem, V.; Molisch, A.F.; Niranjayan, S.; Sangodoyin, S. Coherent UWB Ranging in the Presence of Multiuser Interference. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.; 2014; 13, pp. 4424-4439. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2014.2317741]
28. Ding, H.; Liu, W.; Huang, X.; Zheng, L. First Path Detection Using Rank Test in IR UWB Ranging with Energy Detection Receiver under Harsh Environments. IEEE Commun. Lett.; 2013; 17, pp. 761-764. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2013.022713.122136]
29. Giorgetti, A.; Chiani, M. Time-of-Arrival Estimation Based on Information Theoretic Criteria. IEEE Trans. Signal Process.; 2013; 61, pp. 1869-1879. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2013.2239643]
30. Van Nguyen, T.; Jeong, Y.; Shin, H.; Win, M.Z. Machine Learning for Wideband Localization. IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.; 2015; 33, pp. 1357-1380. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2015.2430191]
31. Savic, V.; Larsson, E.G.; Ferrer-Coll, J.; Stenumgaard, P. Kernel Methods for Accurate UWB-Based Ranging with Reduced Complexity. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.; 2016; 15, pp. 1783-1793. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2015.2496584]
32. Savic, V.; Ferrer-Coll, J.; Ängskog, P.; Chilo, J.; Stenumgaard, P.; Larsson, E.G. Measurement Analysis and Channel Modeling for TOA-Based Ranging in Tunnels. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.; 2015; 14, pp. 456-467. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2014.2350493]
33. Bazzi, A.; Slock, D.T.M.; Meilhac, L. Efficient Maximum Likelihood Joint Estimation of Angles and Times of Arrival of Multiple Paths. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps); San Diego, CA, USA, 6–10 December 2015; pp. 1-7. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOMW.2015.7414203]
34. Wu, S.; Zhang, Q.; Fan, R.; Zhang, N. Match-Filtering Based TOA Estimation for IR-UWB Ranging Systems. Proceedings of the 2008 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing Conference; Crete, Greece, 6–8 August 2008; pp. 1099-1105. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IWCMC.2008.191]
35. Liu, Q.; Zhao, Y.; Yin, Z.; Wu, Z. WDMA-UWB Indoor Positioning Through Channel Classification-Based NLOS Mitigation Approach. IEEE Sens. J.; 2024; 24, pp. 28995-29005. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2024.3434329]
36. Yang, S.; Shi, D.; Peng, Y.; Qin, W.; Zhang, Y. Joint Communication-Motion Planning for UAV Relaying in Urban Areas. Proceedings of the 2021 18th Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking (SECON); Virtual, 6–9 July 2021; pp. 1-9. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SECON52354.2021.9491604]
37. Watanabe, T.; Nishimori, K. Channel Capacity of Millimeter-Wave Communication System Using Drone Relay Stations. Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Workshop on Electromagnetics: Applications and Student Innovation Competition (iWEM); Narashino, Japan, 29–31 August 2022; pp. 19-20. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iWEM52897.2022.9993612]
38. Gan, Z.; Cox, M.; Dong, Y. On RIS-aided NLOS Underwater Wireless Optical Communication Systems. Proceedings of the 2024 Photonics & Electromagnetics Research Symposium (PIERS); Chengdu, China, 20 January 2024; pp. 1-7. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/PIERS62282.2024.10618614]
39. Yuan, Y.; He, R.; Ai, B.; Zhang, Z.; Jin, Y. RIS-Assisted Mobile Channels with Directional Transmission: Modeling and Characteristic Analysis. IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.; 2024; 1. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TWC.2024.3449991]
40. Kim, K.J.; Liu, H.; Wen, M.; Tsiftsis, T.A.; Orlik, P.V.; Poor, H.V. QR Decomposition-Based Cyclic Prefixed Single-Carrier Transmissions for Cooperative Communications: Concepts and Research Landscape. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor.; 2023; 25, pp. 133-155. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2022.3194997]
41. Bishnu, A.; Bhatia, V. On performance analysis of IEEE 802.22 (PHY) for COST-207 channel models. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Conference on Standards for Communications and Networking (CSCN); Tokyo, Japan, 28–30 October 2015; pp. 229-234. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1109/CSCN.2015.7390449]
42. Zhu, Q.; Wang, C.X.; Hua, B.; Kai, M.; Jiang, S.; Yao, M. 3GPP TR 38.901 Channel Model. Wiley 5G Ref; Tafazolli, R.; Wang, C.-L.; Chatzimisios, P. John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2022; [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119471509.w5gref048]
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Non-line-of-sight (NLOS) communication with severe loss always leads to performance degradation in unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) payload communication. In this paper, a UAV NLOS communication scheme based on single-carrier frequency domain equalization with cyclic prefix and cyclic suffix (CP/CS-SC-FDE) is designed. First, the reasons behind the generation of later intersymbol interference (LISI) in UAV NLOS communication are investigated. Then, the frame structure of conventional single-carrier frequency domain equalization with cyclic prefix (CP-SC-FDE) is improved, and the UAV NLOS communication frame structure based on cyclic prefix (CP) and cyclic suffix (CS) is designed. Furthermore, a channel estimation algorithm applicable to this scheme is proposed. The numerical results show that this UAV communication scheme can eliminate intersymbol interference (ISI) in NLOS communication. Compared with the conventional CP-SC-FDE system, this scheme can achieve excellent performance in the Rayleigh channel and other standard NLOS channels. In the CP/CS-SC-FDE system, the BER result is similar to that under ideal synchronization.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
![Link to external site, this link will open in a new tab VIAFID ORCID Logo](/assets/ctx/7b16a292/images/docview/orcid.png)
1 Graduate College, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710038, China;
2 College of Aviation Engineering School, Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710038, China;